Epic Back Zip Full Wetsuit vs Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit: which is safer?
Patagonia Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit is the clear pick. O'Neill Epic Back Zip Full Wetsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
O'Neill
Epic Back Zip Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Likelywater-repellent coating surface coating degradation and leaching
PossibleNeoprene off-gassing and volatile organic compounds
PossibleNylon microfiber shedding during wear and washing
Our pick
Patagonia
Men's R2 Yulex Regulator Front-Zip Full Wetsuit
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins (glues/seams)
LikelyMicroplastics shedding from outer shell
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR surface coating degradation and leaching, Neoprene off-gassing and volatile organic compounds and Nylon microfiber shedding during wear and washing on the O'Neill and not on the Patagonia.
- We flag Formaldehyde-releasing resins (glues/seams) and Microplastics shedding from outer shell on the Patagonia and not on the O'Neill.
- The O'Neill is Neoprene with DWR-treated nylon exterior where the Patagonia is Yulex (synthetic rubber), neoprene-free base, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the O'Neill grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More wetsuits, see the full ranking