Men's Powder Town Pants vs Men's Storm Shift Pants: which is safer?

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants

Patagonia

Men's Powder Town Pants

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 33/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)

PossibleFormaldehyde-resin finishing agents

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from coating degradation

Patagonia Men's Storm Shift Pants

Patagonia

Men's Storm Shift Pants

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Bad 19/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon blend with water-repellent coating treatment (likely fluorocarbon-based)

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unverified PFAS status)

LikelyMicroplastic shedding from nylon during laundering

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and re-application chemical exposure

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified), Formaldehyde-resin finishing agents and Microfiber shedding from coating degradation on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unverified PFAS status), Microplastic shedding from nylon during laundering and DWR coating degradation and re-application chemical exposure on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is nylon blend with DWR water-repellent treatment where the Patagonia is Nylon blend with DWR treatment (likely fluorocarbon-based), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More snow pants, see the full ranking