Men's Powder Town Pants vs Men's Dawnstrike GTX Pants: which is safer?

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Patagonia Men's Powder Town Pants

Patagonia

Men's Powder Town Pants

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 33/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon blend with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified)

PossibleFormaldehyde-resin finishing agents

PossibleMicrofiber shedding from coating degradation

The North Face Men's Dawnstrike GTX Pants

The North Face

Men's Dawnstrike GTX Pants

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 2/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon with GORE-TEX membrane (ePTFE laminate)

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde-based finish resins

ReportedGORE-TEX Teflon-family coating membrane durability and coating degradation

PossibleNylon fiber microplastic shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified), Formaldehyde-resin finishing agents and Microfiber shedding from coating degradation on the Patagonia and not on the The North Face.
  • We flag Formaldehyde-based finish resins, GORE-TEX fluoropolymer membrane durability and coating degradation and Nylon fiber microplastic shedding on the The North Face and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is nylon blend with DWR water-repellent treatment where the The North Face is Nylon with GORE-TEX membrane (ePTFE laminate), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More snow pants, see the full ranking