PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Dawnstrike GTX Pants

The North Face · Snow Pants

The North Face Men's Dawnstrike GTX Pants

Bad

Avoid if you're concerned about PFAS; GORE-TEX Teflon-family coating may contain legacy PFAS without brand disclosure.

Verdict: SkipDurable nylon-GORE-TEX snow pants with no established non-PFAS hazards in textile dyes or coatings, but PFAS disclosure gap demands informed choice.

These pants use GORE-TEX's ePTFE waterproof membrane, a Teflon-family coating material historically linked to PFAS residues in manufacturing. The North Face offers no transparency about PFAS content or safer options.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with GORE-TEX membrane (ePTFE laminate)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon textiles often receive formaldehyde-releasing resin finishes (cross-linking agents for wrinkle resistance and shape memory). GORE-TEX lamination and water-repellent water-repellent coating treatments may also employ formaldehyde-containing adhesives. The North Face provides no restricted substance list; outgassing during initial wear is possible but typically minimal after first wash.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
♾️

GORE-TEX Teflon-family coating membrane durability and coating degradation

ePTFE itself is chemically stable and does not degrade during normal wear. However, the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the nylon face degrades with washing and UV exposure, typically losing effectiveness within 3-5 years. Reapplication products (Nikwax) contain non-PFAS fluorocarbon alternatives, but North Face does not specify whether original water-repellent coating is fluorinated or not.

45/ 100
🫧

Nylon fiber microplastic shedding

All synthetic nylon textiles shed microfibers during washing and mechanical abrasion. GORE-TEX lamination reduces loose fiber release compared to non-coated nylon, but machine washing still generates microplastic particles. This is category-wide, not specific to this brand, and no manufacturer addresses it directly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or test data on record for The North Face nylon apparel. Azo dyes used in nylon manufacturing can theoretically contain restricted amines, but EU and US suppliers have largely phased high-risk compounds. Without third-party certification, hazard status is unverified but not unusually elevated for this product class.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester blends

This product is primarily nylon with synthetic laminate, not polyester. Antimony catalysts are used in polyester production but are not a direct concern here. Included for completeness but not a material risk.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These pants use nylon fabric bonded to GORE-TEX, a microporous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) laminate. The ePTFE membrane itself is not Teflon-type coating fume risk (Teflon-type coating only off-gases under extreme heat above 260°C, irrelevant in wear). Nylon provides mechanical durability but requires chemical processing, specifically dyes and finish resins applied during manufacturing, to achieve weather resistance, color fastness, and softness.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face does not publicly disclose chemical composition, PFAS presence, or third-party certifications for this product line. The brand has faced no major textile chemical recalls or formal safety violations on record, but maintains silence on Teflon-family coating sourcing and legacy PFAS content in GORE-TEX laminates. This lack of transparency is standard across outdoor apparel but leaves end-users unable to verify fluorine-based water repellent (water-repellent coating) formulations.

How it compares in its category

GORE-TEX is a market-leading breathable membrane, more durable than cheaper polyurethane (PU) laminates but nearly all GORE-TEX products carry PFAS uncertainty due to the Teflon-family coating backbone. Competitors using non-fluorinated water-repellent coating (e.g., Patagonia's newer H.P. base layer line, Rab alternatives) are explicitly marketed as PFAS-free but remain rare in heavy-duty snow pants. Standard nylon snow pants without laminate membranes avoid the Teflon-family coating question entirely but sacrifice waterproofing longevity.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water with mild detergent; do not dry-clean or heat-dry (nylon softens above 80°C and water-repellent coating coatings degrade). Inspect seams and zippers annually for mechanical damage; GORE-TEX itself is a barrier and does not degrade, but fabric abrasion and coating wear reduce effective waterproofing within 3-5 years of regular use. Do not apply iron-on patches or high-heat repairs. If PFAS exposure is a personal concern, this product may warrant consultation with a dermatologist or toxicologist before purchase, given disclosure gaps.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More snow pants grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.