Men's Straight Fit Jeans vs Rugged Wear Performance Series Regular Fit Jeans: which is safer?

Patagonia Men's Straight Fit Jeans is the clear pick. Wrangler Rugged Wear Performance Series Regular Fit Jeans carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Patagonia Men's Straight Fit Jeans

Patagonia

Men's Straight Fit Jeans

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 82/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

cotton denim, no water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Confidence

82%

PossibleFormaldehyde-based finishing resins

PossibleDye bleed and skin contact allergens

Wrangler Rugged Wear Performance Series Regular Fit Jeans

Wrangler

Rugged Wear Performance Series Regular Fit Jeans

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

100% cotton denim (untreated)

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes and color fastness

PossibleFormaldehyde-based resins in finishing

PossibleMicrofiber shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde-based finishing resins and Dye bleed and skin contact allergens on the Patagonia and not on the Wrangler.
  • We flag Azo dyes and color fastness, Formaldehyde-based resins in finishing and Microfiber shedding on the Wrangler and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is cotton denim, no durable water repellent (DWR) coating where the Wrangler is 100% cotton denim (untreated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More stain-resistant jeans, see the full ranking