PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall49/ 100Poor
Patagonia Men's Straight Fit Jeans

Patagonia · Stain-Resistant Jeans

Patagonia Men's Straight Fit Jeans

Good

Lower concern for untreated cotton denim. Patagonia's PFAS transparency limited.

Verdict: SkipUntreated cotton denim with minimal chemical risk; Patagonia's sustainability focus and repair program offset limited PFAS transparency.

These jeans are conventional cotton denim without marketed water-repellent or stain-resistant finishes, typical PFAS vectors in apparel. Patagonia hasn't published PFAS-free claims or disclosed supplier testing. Cotton fiber carries lower inherent PFAS risk than technical textiles.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

cotton denim, no water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes and indigo dyestuff

Cotton denim is dyed with indigo (non-toxic) and supplementary reactive or azo dyes (potential allergens or amine release in acidic conditions). Patagonia does not publicly disclose azo dye restrictions or heavy metal testing for indigo baths, so residual dye exposure during wear and washing is unquantified.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Cotton textiles routinely use formaldehyde-based resins for crease retention and sizing. No public statement from Patagonia confirms formaldehyde-free production for this product. Off-gassing is typically minimal after first washing but not eliminated.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Fiber shedding and microfiber release

Conventional cotton denim sheds fibers during wear and washing, contributing to microfiber pollution. This is a material-class issue, not brand-specific, but untreated fabric may shed more readily than coated alternatives. Washing in a bag reduces environmental burden but does not eliminate personal exposure to lint.

70/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

Patagonia's standard denim line does not specify organic certification; conventional cotton may retain trace pesticides from field application. Pesticide residues are not known to transfer significantly to skin during wear, but washing may mobilize them into wastewater. Patagonia offers organic denim alternatives if this is a concern.

Source: EPA
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or public safety alerts for Patagonia denim involving lead, cadmium, or arsenic in dyes. Standard textile testing by third parties (OEKO-TEX, Bluesign) would flag problematic levels, but Patagonia does not advertise such certifications for this specific line.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

These jeans are standard cotton denim with no water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating, which means they lack the fluorinated chemicals common in stain-resistant apparel. The absence of a water-repellent finish reduces exposure to legacy PFAS and other coating-related chemicals. Cotton denim dyeing and finishing still involve chemicals (indigo dyes, sizing agents, softeners), but untreated cotton avoids the persistent synthetic barriers that trap chemicals in the fabric long-term.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has a strong public commitment to environmental and labor standards, including restricted chemical use in manufacturing and transparency reports on their supply chain. However, the brand does not publish detailed chemical inventories or PFAS-specific disclosures for individual products, leaving gaps in verifiable safety documentation. Patagonia's Responsible Wool Standard and organic cotton initiatives demonstrate chemical awareness, but silence on PFAS testing or elimination timelines is a notable limitation. The brand offers a Worn Wear repair and resale program, which indirectly reduces hazard exposure by extending product life.

How it compares in its category

Stain-resistant jeans typically rely on perfluorinated water-repellent coating coatings (C6 or legacy PFAS), which persist in the fabric and body. Patagonia's untreated denim sidesteps this entirely, placing it in a lower-chemical subset of the category. Standard conventional denim carries dye and finishing risks (azo dyes, formaldehyde resins), which Patagonia products are subject to like competitors, but the absence of added chemical coatings is a meaningful safety advantage. Organic cotton versions would further reduce pesticide residues in raw material.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent to reduce dye bleeding and fiber shedding in early wear; avoid chlorine bleach, which can degrade indigo and create unwanted color shifts. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may mobilize residual dyes or sizing. Expect typical cotton shrinkage (2-3%) in the first warm wash. Use the Worn Wear program when seams fail or fit changes, as repair extends the product life and amortizes the chemical burden of manufacturing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 82% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More stain-resistant jeans grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.