Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top vs Women's Luna Underwire Bandeau Cutout Swimsuit: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Reiss Women's Luna Underwire Bandeau Cutout Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Reiss Women's Luna Underwire Bandeau Cutout Swimsuit

Reiss

Women's Luna Underwire Bandeau Cutout Swimsuit

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon, spandex blend (typical swimsuit construction)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and colorant toxicity

PossibleElastic degradation and microfiber shedding

PossibleFormaldehyde-based fabric finishes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Reiss.
  • We flag Azo dyes and colorant toxicity, Elastic degradation and microfiber shedding and Formaldehyde-based fabric finishes on the Reiss and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear) where the Reiss is Nylon, spandex blend (typical swimsuit construction), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear: see the full ranking