Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top vs Women's Premium Surf Short Jane Swimsuit: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Rip Curl Women's Premium Surf Short Jane Swimsuit carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Rip Curl Women's Premium Surf Short Jane Swimsuit

Rip Curl

Women's Premium Surf Short Jane Swimsuit

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Confidence

52%

LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating finish (covered separately in PFAS grade)

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and re-release

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Rip Curl.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish (covered separately in PFAS grade) and DWR coating degradation and re-release on the Rip Curl and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear) where the Rip Curl is Nylon/polyester blend with DWR (durable water-repellent) finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear, see the full ranking