New Puma Pro Formation Hybrid Golf Glove vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?

Where these two actually differ

• We flag Fluorochemical (PFAS) in water-resistant coating, Formaldehyde resins in synthetic leather bonding and Skin irritation from coating or dye residue on the Puma and not on the Wilson.
• We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Puma.
• The Puma is synthetic leather/microfiber with water-resistant treatment where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
• The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Wilson is the one to buy.
• We are less certain about the Puma grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.