New Puma Pro Formation Hybrid Golf Glove
Water-resistant golf glove with undisclosed PFAS composition.
This synthetic microfiber glove has water-resistant finish but Puma won't explain what it is. No third-party testing exists to verify PFAS status.
The better-graded swap
Maxfli
Maxfli Tour S Golf Balls
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
synthetic leather/microfiber with water-resistant treatment
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What New Puma Pro Formation Hybrid Golf Glove is made of, ingredients and materials
This glove uses synthetic leather (likely polyurethane or PVC) bonded to microfiber backing, with a water-resistant topical treatment applied to repel moisture. The water-resistant coating is the key unknown, most golf glove water treatments historically rely on fluorochemical (PFAS) formulations, though some brands have shifted to non-fluorine alternatives in recent years. Puma has not publicly disclosed the specific chemistry of their water-resistance system for this model, which is the primary safety gap here.
What’s concerning
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
PFAS
Water-resistant golf glove treatments historically use fluorinated compounds; Puma has not disclosed whether this model uses fluorine-based or fluorine-free formulations. Unknown risk of skin exposure to PFAS residue during use.
Source, ATSDR ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Polyurethane and PVC synthetic leather often use formaldehyde-based adhesives or cross-linking agents during manufacture. No product-specific test data available; risk is typical for synthetic sports gloves but not quantified for this model.
Source, ATSDR ↗Skin irritation from coating or dye residue
Some users may experience contact dermatitis from new synthetic gloves; typically resolves after a few washes. Risk is individual and not brand-specific.
What’s reassuring
Microfiber backing shedding and inhalation
No reported incidents of microfiber shedding from Puma golf gloves. Risk exists only if coating degrades significantly or glove is damaged; regular inspection minimizes exposure.
Azo dyes in synthetic leather or microfiber
Puma uses modern dyeing standards for apparel, and azo dye restrictions are now standard in the EU and enforced in most premium athletic brands. No specific safety alerts for this product.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Puma has committed to eliminating PFAS in apparel by 2025 as part of broader sustainability pledges, but does not provide product-level transparency for individual gloves or treatment details. No major safety recalls or contamination incidents have been reported for Puma golf gloves specifically. The brand's stance on water-resistant coatings remains opaque; they have not published third-party test data confirming PFAS absence in this product line.
How it compares in its category
Golf gloves with synthetic leather and water-resistant treatments are standard across the market. Competitors including Callaway, TaylorMade, and FootJoy face the same transparency challenges. Puma's approach shows concern levels aligned with category norms, though some premium brands have begun publishing certifications for not containing PFAS; this product lacks that assurance.
If you buy it
Wash the glove regularly in cool water to reduce any potential chemical residue buildup on skin contact areas. Avoid prolonged heating (do not machine dry or expose to direct heat). Store in a dry place to prevent mold growth in the microfiber backing. Replace after 12-18 months of use or sooner if the synthetic leather shows peeling, cracking, or coating degradation, as compromised coatings may shed micro-particles.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Puma has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to New Puma Pro Formation Hybrid Golf Glove?
- Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Cabretta leather, likely tannin-tanned
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- leather or synthetic leather with cotton lining
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore golf balls & equipment grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.