Glider vs Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G: which is safer?
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Rex
Glider
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePlasticizer leaching (if PVC or soft plastic base)
PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing
PossibleFlame retardant exposure (if foam-filled)
Our pick
Star Ski Wax
Star Nf Non-Fluoro Ski Glide Wax 60 G
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor
PossibleSkin sensitization or contact dermatitis
PossibleIngestion risk in children
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Plasticizer leaching (if PVC or soft plastic base), Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing, Flame retardant exposure (if foam-filled) and Coating or finish degradation over time on the Rex and not on the Star Ski Wax.
- We flag Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and mineral oil vapor, Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis and Ingestion risk in children on the Star Ski Wax and not on the Rex.
- The Rex is Unknown, likely composite or plastic base where the Star Ski Wax is hydrocarbon ski wax (non-fluorinated), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- We are less certain about the Rex grade, at 25% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More ski & sports wax, see the full ranking