PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall69/ 100Good
Rex Glider

Rex · Ski & Sports Wax

Rex Glider

Excellent

Insufficient product information to assess PFAS risk.

Verdict · Buy with careUnknown material composition and silent brand stance on chemical safety limit confidence; use with caution pending clarification.

This product is too vague to evaluate. Material composition and manufacturing details are unavailable from public sources. Contact the brand directly for PFAS disclosure.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Unknown, likely composite or plastic base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⛏️

Plasticizer leaching (if PVC or soft plastic base)

Unknown plastic composition means phthalates or BPA cannot be ruled out. Soft plastics degrade and leach more readily in warm conditions or with prolonged contact.

70/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Composite or foam-based gliders commonly release formaldehyde and other VOCs during manufacturing and early use. No emissions standard or test result is on record for this product.

70/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

If the glider contains polyurethane foam, brominated or phosphorus-based flame retardants may be present depending on jurisdiction and supplier. Rex does not disclose flame retardant chemistry.

Source, EPA
70/ 100

Coating or finish degradation over time

Unknown surface finishes may chip, peel, or degrade, potentially releasing paint or adhesive constituents. No durability or finish safety data is publicly available.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

No recalls or reports of heavy metal contamination in Rex Glider products are documented. However, absence of evidence is not confirmation; unverified imports carry latent risk if standards compliance is not audited.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rex Glider's material composition is not publicly specified, making chemical hazard assessment difficult. If the base is PVC or soft plastic, plasticizers and off-gassing become concerns. If it is foam or composite, flame retardants and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be present. Without manufacturer disclosure, you cannot verify safety certifications or material sourcing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rex does not publish detailed material safety data, ingredient lists, or chemical compliance statements on this product. No third-party certifications (e.g., Oeko-Tex, GREENGUARD, CE mark compliance details) are available on record. The brand's silence on PFAS and broader chemical safety is consistent with smaller or regional manufacturers that do not prioritize transparency.

How it compares in its category

Without knowing the exact product category (furniture component, sporting good, toy, or other), direct comparison is limited. Gliders typically use foam cushioning, wood or metal frames, and plastic or fabric covers; Rex's version lacks public detail on all three. Competitors in similar categories often disclose material safety or hold certifications Rex does not advertise.

If you buy it

Request a safety data sheet (SDS) or material composition document from the manufacturer before purchase. Air the product in a well-ventilated space for 48-72 hours if odor is present, indicating off-gassing. Avoid prolonged contact with skin, especially for children. Contact Rex directly to confirm absence of prohibited chemicals (lead, cadmium, phthalates) rather than assuming compliance.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 25% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Sports Wax

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
⚠️

Combustion by-products during hot application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Swix PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Swix

PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Hydrocarbon wax blend (paraffin/synthetic hydrocarbon base)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from heating

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation of wax dust during application

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Maplus Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

Maplus

Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

ski wax base, fluorine-free formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Hydrocarbon volatiles and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

More ski & sports wax grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.