Galaxy Watch9 vs Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz: which is safer?
Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Samsung
Galaxy Watch9
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePolymer strap degradation and allergen release
PossibleNickel or metal ion release from stainless steel
PossibleGlass display edge trauma and coating degradation
Our pick
Swatch
Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleResin band VOC off-gassing
PossibleResin band degradation over time
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel case
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Polymer strap degradation and allergen release, Nickel or metal ion release from stainless steel, Glass display edge trauma and coating degradation and Bacterial growth in strap crevices and seals on the Samsung and not on the Swatch.
- We flag Resin band VOC off-gassing, Resin band degradation over time and Nickel leaching from stainless steel case on the Swatch and not on the Samsung.
- The Samsung is Stainless steel case, glass display, polymer straps, waterproof sealing compounds where the Swatch is Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Samsung grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof smartphone cases, see the full ranking