Mega Cartridge Napkins,PK875, 6 PK vs 100% Recycled Paper Napkins: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Scott
Mega Cartridge Napkins,PK875, 6 PK
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
virgin fiber paper napkin, uncoated
Confidence
78%
PossibleChlorine residues (bleaching byproducts)
PossibleBacterial or mold growth in storage
Seventh Generation
100% Recycled Paper Napkins
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
100% recycled paper
Confidence
82%
PossibleTrace metals and contaminants from recycled feedstock
PossibleMicrobial growth (mold, mildew) in storage
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Chlorine residues (bleaching byproducts) and Bacterial or mold growth in storage on the Scott and not on the Seventh Generation.
- We flag Trace metals and contaminants from recycled feedstock and Microbial growth (mold, mildew) in storage on the Seventh Generation and not on the Scott.
- The Scott is virgin fiber paper napkin, uncoated where the Seventh Generation is 100% recycled paper, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More paper napkins & paper towels, see the full ranking