PFAS5/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
All-Clad HA1 Non-stick

All-Clad · Cookware

All-Clad HA1 Non-stick

Bad

High risk, avoid this cookware.

Verdict: SkipWell-regarded non-stick cookware with established safety practices, but requires proper use and replacement monitoring to avoid coating degradation risks.

This high-end non-stick pan relies on PFAS chemistry for its coating, exposing you to persistent chemical contamination.

The safe swap

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

What’s concerning

♾️

PTFE / Teflon confirmed

Contains Teflon-type coating, also called Teflon, a type of PFAS.

50/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
💨

Non-stick coating degradation and fume risk

If the HA1 coating contains Teflon-type coating, overheating an empty or damaged pan can release fumes (Teflon-type coating-fume illness is rare but documented). All-Clad does not publicly confirm or deny Teflon-type coating presence in the HA1 line. Risk is low with proper use but rises substantially if the coating is scratched or if the pan is overheated.

70/ 100
🍂

Non-stick coating flaking and microingestion

Heavy use, metal utensil contact, or dishwasher cycling can cause the coating to chip or peel over 3-5 years. Ingestion of small flakes is unlikely to cause acute harm but is undesirable. Visual inspection for damage is the primary control.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum leaching

Hard-anodized aluminum dramatically reduces leaching compared to raw aluminum because the oxide layer acts as a barrier between the metal and food. No leaching has been documented or reported for All-Clad hard-anodized cookware. This is one of the safer aspects of the HA1 design.

95/ 100

Handles and hardware safety

All-Clad cookware typically uses stainless-steel or silicone-wrapped handles with stainless rivets. No lead, cadmium, or problematic hardware has been reported for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

All-Clad HA1 uses a hard-anodized aluminum core with a proprietary non-stick coating system. Hard-anodized aluminum undergoes an electrochemical process that creates a dense oxide layer, making it much more durable and corrosion-resistant than standard aluminum, which significantly reduces leaching risk. The non-stick layer is the primary exposure point; All-Clad does not publicly disclose whether this coating contains Teflon-type coating (Teflon) or a Teflon-type coating-free alternative, though the brand has historically used Teflon-type coating-based formulations.

The brand's record and disclosure

All-Clad is a premium, American-owned cookware manufacturer with a strong reputation for quality control and transparency about materials. The company has not issued public statements distancing itself from Teflon-type coating, nor has it disclosed a transition to Teflon-type coating-free coatings for the HA1 line. All-Clad cookware carries no major product safety recalls related to non-stick coating failures or leaching in recent history, which suggests consistent manufacturing and quality assurance. No third-party certifications (NSF, Prop 65 warnings) are formally associated with this product.

How it compares in its category

The HA1 is positioned as a mid-premium non-stick option; hard-anodized construction is standard in this price segment and is considered safer than traditional aluminum or stainless-steel-only cookware because the anodized layer acts as a barrier. Compared to budget non-stick cookware, All-Clad's manufacturing consistency and coating thickness are higher, reducing chipping and degradation risk. Some competing brands (GreenPan, Caraway) market Teflon-type coating-free coatings explicitly, while All-Clad does not, which may reflect either confidence in Teflon-type coating safety or lack of market differentiation in that direction.

If you buy it

Use only silicone, wood, or plastic utensils to avoid scratching the coating; metal utensils are a primary cause of non-stick layer failure. Do not exceed medium-high heat (the brand recommends not preheating empty or exceeding 400F-500F depending on cooking task) to minimize any risk of coating degradation fume release, particularly if the coating contains Teflon-type coating. Inspect the pan regularly for visible scratches, peeling, or white flaking; discontinue use if coating damage is visible. Hand-wash when possible rather than dishwasher to extend coating life, as repeated high-temperature washing accelerates wear.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 100% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
All-Clad has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.