PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
ATSKO Water-Guard Extreme Waterproofing Spray

Atsko · Outdoor Furniture Cushion Protectants

ATSKO Water-Guard Extreme Waterproofing Spray

Poor

Wait for better formula transparency. Waterproofing sprays often contain PFAS.

Verdict · SkipHigh PFAS risk in waterproofing spray plus opaque formula and silent brand stance on chemical disclosure justify avoidance.

Atsko Water-Guard is a waterproof furniture spray with undisclosed active ingredients. Waterproofing sprays commonly use PFAS, and no transparency is offered.

The better-graded swap

Crew Stripe Indoor/Outdoor Pillow - Seaglass, 20" x 20" Square, 20" x 20" Square Spa Tassels - Frontgate

Frontgate

Crew Stripe Indoor/Outdoor Pillow - Seaglass, 20" x 20" Square, 20" x 20" Square Spa Tassels - Frontgate

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

proprietary waterproofing spray formulation, unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

Vague safety claims only

Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and solvent emissions

Spray-applied waterproofing formulations typically contain hydrocarbon or solvent carriers that off-gas during application and curing. Without published VOC limits or solvent identification, inhalation exposure during application and initial off-gassing phase cannot be quantified or mitigated.

20/ 100
💨

Respiratory irritation from aerosol inhalation

Spray waterproofing products commonly trigger coughing, throat irritation, and breathing difficulty during application. Propellants and atomized particles from this class of product pose acute inhalation risk, particularly for users with asthma or respiratory sensitivity.

45/ 100
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Undisclosed chemical formulations in waterproofing sprays can cause dermatitis, eye redness, or allergic contact reactions. The absence of published safety warnings or ingredient disclosure prevents identification of known irritants or allergens specific to this product.

70/ 100
💨

Persistent off-gassing into indoor air

Fluorochemical and solvent-based waterproofing sprays may continue releasing VOCs and other volatile compounds into indoor air for days or weeks after application. Treated furniture or upholstery can become an ongoing source of indoor air contamination, particularly in poorly ventilated spaces.

70/ 100
♾️

Environmental bioaccumulation risk via fluorochemicals

If this spray contains conventional PFAS-based water repellents (consistent with the product's high PFAS risk grade), fluorochemicals will accumulate in soil and water and persist indefinitely. Disposal of treated textiles or furniture introduces these chemicals into waste streams.

20/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

ATSKO Water-Guard Extreme is a proprietary waterproofing spray formulation with undisclosed active ingredients. Waterproofing sprays in this category typically rely on fluorochemical repellents or silicone-based coatings to create water resistance on fabrics and soft furnishings. The specific chemistry of this product remains unpublished, preventing independent assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), solvent carriers, or other chemical constituents that off-gas during and after application.

The brand's record and disclosure

ATSKO has maintained public silence on PFAS content and broader chemical composition of Water-Guard Extreme despite industry-wide scrutiny of waterproofing products. No third-party certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, or similar) are documented for this product. The lack of proactive transparency on ingredient lists or safety data sheets is inconsistent with industry leaders who have begun phasing fluorochemicals or disclosing their use.

How it compares in its category

Waterproofing sprays occupy a high-risk category for PFAS exposure due to their reliance on fluorochemical repellents for water and stain resistance. Alternatives include PFOA/PFOS-free silicone-based sprays (e.g., Scotchgard Advanced Protector, which carries third-party testing), wax-based treatments, or paraffin-based formulations that avoid fluorochemicals entirely. ATSKO's refusal to disclose formula details puts it below competitors offering certifications or published ingredient safety profiles.

If you buy it

Apply only in well-ventilated outdoor spaces or open areas to minimize inhalation of spray aerosols and VOCs. Avoid repeated applications to the same surface unless manufacturer guidance explicitly permits it. Treated furniture should off-gas for 24-48 hours before indoor use. Allow any treated textiles or upholstery to fully dry in open air before contact with skin or food preparation surfaces. Consider reapplication frequency and whether more transparent alternatives meet your durability needs before committing to repeated use of an opaque product.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Atsko has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Outdoor Furniture Cushion Protectants

Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion

Acadia Outdoor 61in Sofa Cushion

Polyester cushion cover; likely acrylic or polyester-blend upholstery

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade39Poor
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🍳

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating or dyes

Limited concern

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Mildew and bacterial growth if moisture trapped

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern likely, but West Elm discloses nothing.

Starting grade for this product type

West Elm Acadia Lounge Chair Cushion

West Elm

Acadia Lounge Chair Cushion

Polyester upholstery cushion cover

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Limited concern

70

Lower concern cushion, but West Elm provides no PFAS transparency.

Starting grade for this product type

Westport Slim Outdoor 68in Sofa Cushion

West Elm

Westport Slim Outdoor 68in Sofa Cushion

Polyester/cotton blend cushion cover, no specified water or stain treatment

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding and degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold and bacterial growth if waterlogged

High concern

20

Lower PFAS concern. Standard outdoor cushion with no reported treatments flagging risk.

Starting grade for this product type

More outdoor furniture cushion protectants grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.