PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

B+W · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

Poor

Glass base reduces concern; nano-coating composition undisclosed by brand.

Verdict · SkipGlass optical base is inert; nano-coating PFAS status unclear but typical for water-repellent films. Brand opaque on materials; no recalls or contamination reports on record.

B+W Master Clear uses glass with a proprietary water-repellent nano-coating designed to shed water and dust. Coating chemistry stays unspecified and no PFAS disclosure or testing data is available.

The better-graded swap

Nanuk 909 Waterproof Hard Case for DJI Osmo Pocket 3

Nanuk

Nanuk 909 Waterproof Hard Case for DJI Osmo Pocket 3

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Glass with water-repellent nano-coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano is made of, ingredients and materials

The B+W Master Clear is a glass optical filter with a proprietary water-repellent nano-coating (MRC Nano). The glass substrate itself is chemically stable and does not leach contaminants into food, water, or contact with skin. The nano-coating's exact composition is not disclosed by B+W; such coatings often rely on silane chemistry or Teflon-family coating to achieve water-beading properties, which introduces uncertainty around PFAS content (covered separately in your PFAS grade).

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation over time

Water-repellent nano-coatings on optics can degrade with prolonged UV exposure, humidity, or mechanical wear. B+W does not publish durability timelines; expected lifespan is typically several years with normal care. Degraded coating reduces function but does not create a direct safety hazard.

70/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Water-repellent nano-coatings commonly use fluorochemistry; B+W has not confirmed or denied PFAS use. As a camera filter in non-food applications, exposure to humans is negligible unless coating degrades and particles are inhaled or ingested, which is not a standard use scenario.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Nano-coating leaching or off-gassing

No reports of optical filter nano-coatings leaching into skin, water, or air under normal use. Glass does not off-gas; the coating risk is mainly if mechanically damaged or exposed to extreme heat (far outside intended use as a camera filter).

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Optical glass from reputable manufacturers is formulated to avoid lead and cadmium; B+W is ISO-certified for optical products. No independent testing or recalls suggest contamination. The nano-coating composition is undisclosed but is not in contact with consumables.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microabrasion or particle shedding from coating

Well-bonded nano-coatings do not shed particles during normal use. Damage (scratching, chipping) could theoretically release coating fragments, but this is a durability issue, not a chemical hazard, and would be immediately visible.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

B+W (a division of Schneider Optics) has not published transparency reports on nano-coating chemistry or PFAS use in their optical coatings. No safety recalls, contamination incidents, or independent lab findings of hazardous substances in B+W filters are on public record. The brand's silence on coating composition limits independent verification but does not indicate a known problem.

How it compares in its category

Optical filters (camera, lighting) are a minor-exposure category compared to cookware or food packaging. Glass-based filters with hydrophobic coatings are standard across the industry; B+W is a market leader. Uncoated glass filters exist but offer less water resistance. The MRC Nano coating is competitive in durability but introduces the nano-material unknowns that define this product's risk profile.

If you buy it

Handle with care to avoid scratching the nano-coating, which can reduce performance. Clean with lens cloth or mild soap and distilled water; avoid harsh solvents that might degrade the coating. The coating should remain stable during normal storage and use at room temperature. Replace only if optical clarity degrades or coating delamination becomes visible; the filter itself has no expiration.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
B+W has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • No PFAS statement found from the brand
Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

Samsung

Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glass lens (borosilicate or soda-lime glass)
  • Optical coating degradation

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Sigma 58mm WR Protector Filter

Sigma

58mm WR Protector Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass, aluminum frame, non-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical glass fragility and sharp edges

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.