61Good

B+W Review, Is B+W Non-Toxic?

The verdict
B+W averages 61 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 8 B+W products graded as of November 2026, and 3 of them reach its 70 point pass mark.
Free to quote with attribution to PFAS Authority and a link to pfasauthority.com/brands/b-w.

B+W grades Good on our four-band scale. On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. See what every brand has published about PFAS for how that compares.

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Does B+W have PFAS, by category

Which B+W products are PFAS-free? Good or better, best-graded first

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • No PFAS statement found from the brand
B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter

B+W

67mm UV Haze Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glass optic with multi-coated lens surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical coating degradation. Multi-coated surfaces can degrade over decades of intense UV exposure or if…
B+W Basic Clear Filter MRC

B+W

Basic Clear Filter MRC

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass, multi-coated
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical coating degradation and scratching. The MRC coating can degrade with improper cleaning or storage…

Which B+W products contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

  • optical glass with multi-coated (MRC) lens coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Manufacturing residues on coating surface. New optical filters may have light dust, oils, or manufacturing…
Find an alternative on Amazon
B+W Basic UV Haze MRC Filter

B+W

Basic UV Haze MRC Filter

50GoodPFAS grade
  • Optical glass with multi-coated (MRC) lens coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Coating delamination or wear, MRC coatings on budget filters may degrade with age or rough handling, but…

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Optical glass with MRC nano-coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Nano-coating composition and leachable unknown. The MRC nano-coating is proprietary and B+W does not disclose…

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Optical glass with MRC-nano multi-resistant coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Coating degradation and inhalation risk. If the MRC-nano coating flakes or degrades over extended use…

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

B+W

Master Clear Filter MRC Nano

40PoorPFAS grade
  • Glass with water-repellent nano-coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Coating degradation over time. Water-repellent nano-coatings on optics can degrade with prolonged UV…

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

What to buy instead Good or better, in the categories B+W sells

Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

Samsung

Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Glass lens (borosilicate or soda-lime glass)
  • Optical coating degradation

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Sigma 58mm WR Protector Filter

Sigma

58mm WR Protector Filter

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Optical glass, aluminum frame, non-coated optical surfaces
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Optical glass fragility and sharp edges
Tiffen Photo Twin Pack

Tiffen

Photo Twin Pack

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • glass optical filters
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Coating degradation or delamination

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

B+W and PFAS, common questions

Does B+W have PFAS?
B+W averages 61 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 8 B+W products graded as of November 2026, and 3 of them reach its 70 point pass mark. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
Is B+W non-toxic?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the highest-graded B+W product we have scored, at 85/100. It depends on the product line rather than the brand, so check the grade of the exact item you are buying.
Which B+W products are lower concern for PFAS?
The highest-graded B+W products we have scored are B+W UV Haze 010 Filter, B+W 67mm UV Haze Filter, B+W Basic Clear Filter MRC. That is our model-based estimate from materials and public disclosure, not a lab test.
Which B+W products should I avoid?
The lowest-graded B+W products we have scored are B+W Master Clear Filter MRC Nano, B+W XS-Pro Clear MRC-Nano 007 Filter, B+W Master UV Haze MRC Nano Filter. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →