PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Rectangle Stain-Resistant Table Cover

· Stain-Resistant Textiles

Rectangle Stain-Resistant Table Cover

Bad

Skip until the brand discloses coating composition; stain-resistant textiles commonly use PFAS.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified stain-resistant coating likely contains PFAS; brand silence on composition and no public certifications prevent full hazard assessment.

Blessed Earth markets this as stain-resistant but omits coating information or PFAS content details. Stain-resistant and waterproof covers typically rely on fluorinated treatments.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Unspecified coating on textile base

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified coating on a stain-resistant textile is virtually certain to contain fluorocarbon compounds; brand refusal to disclose type (long-chain PFAS vs. short-chain replacements) prevents specificity. PFAS can migrate into food, dust, and skin contact over the product lifecycle.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

Repeated washing and heat exposure break down polymer coatings; unknown formulation means unknown durability profile. Degraded coating may shed particles or allow underlying textile dyes and finishes to leach.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Wrinkle-resistance and finish durability in budget textiles sometimes rely on formaldehyde-releasing resins. No disclosure here means this cannot be ruled out. Off-gassing risk is typically low after initial washing but varies with storage and humidity.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in textile base

No specific report of harmful azo dyes in Blessed Earth products, but fiber content and dye type are undisclosed. Budget tablecloths may use azo dyes that can release aromatic amines under certain conditions; transparency about color fastness and dye class would clarify this.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No public recall or testing data for Blessed Earth tablecloths. Pigment and dye heavy metal content (lead, cadmium, chromium) is a general textile industry concern but not reported as a known issue with this brand or product line.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Blessed Earth has not disclosed the textile base fiber (cotton, polyester, blend) or the chemical identity of the stain-resistant coating. Stain-resistant table textiles almost universally rely on fluorocarbon compounds (PFAS family) to repel liquids and stains. Without ingredient transparency, you cannot determine whether the coating is a legacy PFAS (long-chain), newer PFAS substitute, or non-fluorinated alternative. The textile base matters because polyester blends may contain other processing chemicals (dyes, finishes) that carry separate risks.

The brand's record and disclosure

Blessed Earth has not published material safety data sheets, ingredient lists, or third-party certifications for this product. The brand has taken no public stance on PFAS use or avoidance. No recalls or health controversies are on record for this specific product, but silence on coating composition is a red flag in a category where PFAS disclosure is now standard practice among transparent manufacturers. This lack of transparency is not uncommon in the budget tablecloth market, but it prevents informed risk assessment.

How it compares in its category

Most stain-resistant tablecloths still use PFAS coatings, though certified alternatives (organic cotton without treatment, or PFAS-free polyester finishes from brands like Crate and Barrel or Williams-Sonoma) are increasingly available. Blessed Earth's silence places it at the less transparent end of the spectrum. Uncoated or lightly treated cotton alternatives eliminate coating risk entirely but sacrifice stain resistance and durability. Budget brands rarely disclose coating chemistry; this product is typical of that segment rather than notably worse or better.

If you buy it

Do not expose to heat above gentle warm water washing to avoid coating degradation and potential chemical off-gassing. Machine wash cold and air dry; high heat in dryers can break down the coating and release volatiles. Inspect the surface annually for peeling, flaking, or loss of water beading; replace if coating visibly deteriorates, as damaged surfaces may shed microparticles. Wash separately from other textiles the first 2-3 times to minimize transfer of loose finish particles.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Stain-Resistant Textiles

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

100% cotton

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast concerns

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and mold

Limited concern

70

Plain cotton tablecloth, no surface treatments, lower PFAS concern.

Starting grade for this product type

ETHAN allen Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

Ethan Allen

Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

polyester fabric with unknown finish treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

Water repellent finish degradation and leachables

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Skip pending brand verification of finish treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Ethan Allen Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

Ethan Allen

Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

upholstery fabric (composition unspecified)

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

No PFAS disclosure available from brand on this cover.

Starting grade for this product type

More stain-resistant textiles grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.