PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Bick 5 Complete Leather Care Spray

Bickmore · Leather Conditioner

Bick 5 Complete Leather Care Spray

Poor

Leather spray with water-repellent claims. No PFAS information available.

Verdict · SkipWater-repellent leather spray with undisclosed PFAS and limited ingredient transparency; typical use requires adequate ventilation and avoiding inhalation during application.

Bick 5 is marketed with water-resistant properties typical of leather treatments. The brand provides no PFAS claims or certifications.

The better-graded swap

Weiman Leather Cleaner and Conditioner

Weiman

Weiman Leather Cleaner and Conditioner

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

leather conditioner spray with water-resistance

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Solvent inhalation (spray exposure)

Spray-delivery format creates inhalation risk from volatile organic compounds (likely hydrocarbons or silicone-based solvents). Brooks does not disclose solvent identity, so specific toxicity cannot be assessed. Ventilation during application is essential to minimize exposure.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Water-repellent function in leather sprays is historically achieved using fluorinated compounds (PFOA, PFOS, or newer alternatives). Brooks has not disclosed PFAS status or alternatives. Given the product's water-resistance claim and lack of transparency, PFAS presence cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization from fragrance or additives

Leather conditioner sprays often contain fragrance, dyes, or antimicrobial additives that can trigger contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Bick 5 does not publish a full ingredient list, so specific allergens cannot be identified. Patch test on inconspicuous leather before full application.

70/ 100
⚠️

Flammability of solvent carrier

Many leather conditioner sprays contain flammable solvents. Storage near heat sources or open flames poses a fire hazard. Label warnings should be checked, though Brooks does not prominently advertise flammability data in public materials.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Coating buildup and residue

Repeated application of conditioner sprays can leave waxy or oily residue that attracts dust or becomes sticky over time. No specific reports for Bick 5, but this is a general risk with spray conditioners if not applied sparingly.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Bick 5 is a spray-applied leather conditioner designed to add water resistance and shine to leather goods. Like most leather care sprays, it likely contains organic solvents (possibly hydrocarbons or silicone-based compounds), water-repellent agents, and conditioning oils or waxes. The water-repellent function raises PFAS concern because fluorinated compounds are the most effective water-resistant finishes, though Brooks has not publicly disclosed ingredient lists or PFAS status. Spray delivery means inhalation exposure is possible if not applied in ventilated areas.

The brand's record and disclosure

Brooks Leather Conditioner has not published detailed ingredient disclosure or made public statements about PFAS avoidance. No major recalls or safety controversies are on record for Bick 5. The brand's silence on PFAS and limited transparency about solvent type or water-repellent chemistry is typical of older leather-care lines but falls short of modern safety communication standards. Independent certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, etc.) are not evident in public sources.

How it compares in its category

Leather conditioner sprays vary widely in transparency and formulation. Some brands (like those carrying OEKO-TEX or similar certifications) openly list solvents and exclude PFAS; others, including Bick 5, do not. This product sits in a middle-of-the-road category, established brand with no known serious incidents, but also no proactive safety messaging. Wax-based or oil-only leather conditioners (non-spray) typically avoid both PFAS and solvent inhalation risks entirely.

If you buy it

Apply Bick 5 in well-ventilated spaces (outdoors or in a room with windows open) to minimize inhalation of spray mist and solvents. Allow treated leather to dry fully before contact with skin or food. Do not use on leather near infants' mouths (e.g., nursing pads, crib bumpers) without extensive drying time. Replace the product if the spray nozzle clogs or leaks, as this indicates potential internal solvent degradation. Store away from heat and sunlight to prevent formulation breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bickmore has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Leather Conditioner

Pirate Goods Leather Conditioner

Pirate Goods Leather Conditioner

Lanolin-based leather conditioning oil

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade45Poor
⚠️

Skin sensitization or allergic contact dermatitis

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Oil oxidation or rancidity if stored improperly

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Buildup or residue on leather if overused

High concern

20

Lower concern for PFAS in this lanolin-based leather conditioner.

Starting grade for this product type

Leather Honey Non-Toxic pH Balanced Leather Conditioner with Flairosol Spray Bottle

Leather Honey

Non-Toxic pH Balanced Leather Conditioner with Flairosol Spray Bottle

Natural wax/oil leather conditioner

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade67Good
⚠️

Skin sensitization or allergic reaction to botanical oils or fragrance

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or fungal growth if conditioner is left wet on leather

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; leather conditioner with oil/wax base unlikely to contain PFAS, but brand discloses nothing.

Starting grade for this product type

Leather Honey Leather Care Kit

Leather Honey

Leather Care Kit

Leather conditioner and cleaning fluid (organic oils and solvents)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvents

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin sensitization from fragrance or natural oils

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Aspiration hazard if ingested

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if improperly sealed

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for this leather care product; no known PFAS triggers, but brand is silent on composition.

Starting grade for this product type

More leather conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.