PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall34/ 100Poor
Lola Bikini Period Underwear

Lola · Period Underwear

Lola Bikini Period Underwear

Good

Brand claims PFAS-free, but no third-party verification provided.

Verdict: SkipOrganic cotton base is low-risk; unverified PFAS-free claim and water-resistant finish warrant scrutiny before purchase.

Lola states their period underwear uses PFAS-free water-resistant treatment on organic cotton. No independent lab testing or certification visible to confirm the claim.

Brand says: “PFAS-free water-resistant technology

The safe swap

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

organic cotton with water-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand claims PFAS-free

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
🍳

Water-resistant coating composition (unspecified)

Lola does not disclose the specific polymer or water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry used. If non-fluorinated alternatives are genuinely used, risk is minimal; if a fluorocarbon other than Teflon-type coating is present, skin contact and wash-water contamination remain possible. The lack of transparency prevents full assessment.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic finish

Any synthetic coating on fabric can shed microplastics during washing and wear, particularly if the finish degrades over time. Organic cotton base mitigates some risk, but the water-resistant layer itself may be synthetic polymer. Repeated washing will gradually erode the coating.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Organic cotton does not eliminate formaldehyde use in textile finishing (e.g., resin cross-linking or dye fixation). Lola claims organic status but does not specify whether the garment is finished with formaldehyde-free processes. Any residual formaldehyde is unlikely to be high enough to cause acute harm, but skin contact on sensitive individuals is a known concern.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🏷️

Allergic sensitization from undisclosed additives

Organic cotton reduces pesticide residue, but the water-resistant finish, elastane components, and dye/fixation chemistry remain undisclosed. Individuals with sensitive skin or latex/elastane allergies should contact Lola for full material composition before purchase.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Brand-stated PFAS-free

The brand states the product is PFAS-free (self-declared).

100/ 100

Azo dyes or synthetic dye hazards

No public recalls or warnings exist for Lola period underwear related to azo dye contamination or heavy metals in dyes. If the brand uses GOTS-certified suppliers for organic cotton, azo dye restrictions are typically enforced, but Lola does not advertise GOTS certification, so this cannot be confirmed.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Lola's period underwear uses organic cotton as the primary fabric, which avoids synthetic pesticide residues common in conventional cotton. The water-resistant finish is the critical variable here: it likely involves a coating or treatment to achieve leak protection without Teflon-type coating (Teflon). Organic cotton itself poses minimal chemical hazard, but the durability and composition of the water-resistant layer determines whether microplastics or synthetic chemicals migrate into skin or wash water over time.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lola markets itself as a period-care brand with emphasis on sustainability and chemical transparency. The brand claims PFAS-free construction, but as noted, no independent third-party testing (e.g., Oeko-Tex, GOTS verification) has been publicly disclosed to verify this claim. Lola has not published detailed material safety data sheets or disclosed the specific water-resistant technology used. Without certification or transparency, the claim remains a marketing statement rather than a verified standard.

How it compares in its category

Period underwear as a category typically uses either synthetic blends (polyester/nylon with elastane) or organic cotton bases, both with proprietary water-resistant finishes. Lola's organic cotton choice aligns with the premium, eco-conscious segment. Competitors like Thinx and Knix similarly claim PFAS-free or reduced-chemical approaches but also lack universal third-party verification. Lola's positioning is middle-of-pack for this category: better transparency than some mass-market brands, but less certified than specialized textiles with Oeko-Tex Gold.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water with mild detergent to preserve the water-resistant coating and minimize microplastic shedding. Avoid bleach, fabric softener, and high heat drying, which can degrade the finish and trigger chemical leaching. Replace every 6-12 months depending on wash frequency and visible coating wear (flaking, pilling, reduced absorbency). Do not machine dry on high heat; air dry or use low heat to extend product life and reduce potential off-gassing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lola has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Water-resistant coating degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and odor with improper care

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. MADE SAFE certified, PFAS-free claimed and tested.

MADE SAFE

Lab test found no PFAS

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🫧

Water-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; PFAS-free certified, organic cotton base.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOEKO-TEX Standard 100

Lab test found no PFAS

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

Lola

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

organic cotton with gusseted absorbent layer

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton core, no water-resistant treatment disclosed.

Risky category by default

More period underwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.