PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Nike Men's Stride Dri-FIT ADV Running Tank Top

Nike · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Nike Men's Stride Dri-FIT ADV Running Tank Top

Bad

Dri-FIT treatment raises concern; Nike provides no PFAS disclosure.

Verdict · SkipPolyester tank with undisclosed Dri-FIT finish; PFAS concern unresolved, but no formaldehyde or azo dye issues documented. Buy with caution pending Nike transparency.

Nike's Dri-FIT is a moisture-wicking finish commonly applied to polyester. Nike provides no public PFAS commitment or testing data.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester blend with Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Dri-FIT coating mechanism is not publicly disclosed by Nike; fluorochemicals are common in hydrophobic athletic finishes. No recall or test report on this specific model exists, but the finish category carries unresolved PFAS risk.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend

All polyester apparel sheds microfibers during washing; the Dri-FIT treatment may alter shedding slightly, but no brand-specific data exists. This is a laundry-system environmental hazard, not a wearer safety hazard.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester production may involve antimony as a catalyst, but contamination at consumer-detectable levels in finished apparel is not a documented issue for Nike products or this category.

95/ 100

Azo dyes (color fastness concerns)

Nike uses restricted azo dyes in most mainstream apparel and tests for compliance; no specific recalls or warnings documented for Dri-FIT tank colorants. Standard polyester dyes are stable in wear and washing.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dri-FIT is a hydrophobic finish, not a wrinkle-resist resin; formaldehyde-based finishes are not typical in this treatment class. No documented formaldehyde release from Nike athletic apparel.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tank is polyester blend with Nike's proprietary Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatment applied to the fabric surface. Dri-FIT technology typically involves fluorochemical coatings or hydrophobic finishes that repel sweat, and Nike has not publicly disclosed whether PFAS compounds are part of this formulation. Polyester itself is stable and does not leach chemicals during normal wear, but the applied finish is the unknown variable here.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike has faced public pressure on PFAS transparency but has not published a comprehensive chemical disclosure policy for apparel treatments as of recent public record. The company has made commitments to reduce certain hazardous chemicals but remains silent on PFAS use in Dri-FIT and similar performance coatings across its lineup. This lack of disclosure is a material gap in consumer trust for a premium product at this price point.

How it compares in its category

Most high-performance athletic tanks from major brands (Adidas, Under Armour, Lululemon) use similar chemical finishes without public PFAS disclosure, making this a category-wide problem rather than Nike-specific. However, brands like Patagonia and some smaller athletic makers have committed to PFAS-free moisture management. If PFAS avoidance is a priority, this product sits in the higher-risk tier of mainstream performance apparel.

If you buy it

Wash in cool or warm water (not hot) before first wear to reduce potential leaching of residual finish chemicals. Machine wash on gentle cycle with mild detergent; avoid chlorine bleach which can degrade polyester. Do not tumble dry on high heat, as elevated temperature may weaken the Dri-FIT coating. If Nike publishes PFAS test results or commits to PFAS-free formulations, reassess your purchase decisions on future replacements.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Basic cotton tee, lower PFAS concern with no waterproofing.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton, no water-repellent finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, plain cotton tee with no water-repellent coating treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

100% cotton long-sleeve shirt

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and dye residuals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, bare cotton apparel with no added treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.