PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall6/ 100Bad
Women's Nike Tempo Dri-FIT Running Top

Nike · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Women's Nike Tempo Dri-FIT Running Top

Bad

No PFAS claim; Dri-FIT finish may contain fluorochemicals, skip if concerned.

Verdict · SkipPolyester apparel with undisclosed Dri-FIT finish; no formaldehyde or azo-dye issues on record, but fluorochemical moisture treatment opacity warrants informed purchase and standard laundry precautions.

Nike doesn't disclose PFAS use in Dri-FIT apparel. Moisture-wicking finishes often use fluorochemicals, though this isn't confirmed here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester with Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed moisture-wicking coating (likely fluorochemical)

Dri-FIT's exact formulation is proprietary. Water and oil repellency on polyester textiles typically relies on fluorinated compounds; Nike has not confirmed use of PFAS-free alternatives for this product. Risk of skin contact and inhalation during wear is low, but leaching into sweat and shedding during laundering are possible.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during wash and wear

Polyester garments shed microplastic fibers, particularly in early washes and with agitation. This is not a direct wearer hazard but an environmental concern; washing in cold water and using a microfiber-catching bag reduces release.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recall, report, or public disclosure of formaldehyde-based resins in Nike Tempo lines. Polyester and Dri-FIT treatments do not inherently require formaldehyde, though some textile finishing plants may use them; Nike does not state exclusion.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes (banned or restricted colorants)

Nike apparel typically meets U.S. and EU standards for azo dyes. No specific incident or recall linked to this product; however, independent testing of Nike apparel has not been widely published.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony oxide is a common polyester catalyst that can remain in trace amounts in finished fiber. Dermal absorption is minimal during normal wear; no documented health incident from athletic polyester apparel in this category.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This top is 100% polyester with Nike's proprietary Dri-FIT moisture-wicking treatment applied to the fabric surface. Polyester itself is chemically stable and does not leach toxic compounds into skin under normal wear. However, the Dri-FIT finish is a water and oil-repellent coating whose exact chemical composition Nike does not publicly disclose; such coatings commonly use fluorinated compounds (PFAS-class chemicals) to achieve performance, though some formulations now use alternatives. The treatment remains bound to the fabric when dry but may release volatile compounds or microfiber particles during washing and extended wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nike does not publish ingredient lists or chemical disclosures for functional apparel treatments, including Dri-FIT. The company has faced pressure from environmental and health advocates regarding PFAS use in textiles but has not committed to public phase-out timelines or switched to alternatives with lower concern for PFAS presence in this product line. Nike holds no third-party certifications (such as GOTS or Oeko-Tex) for this item that would verify absence of harmful dyes, resins, or flame retardants. Transparency on this category remains limited.

How it compares in its category

Women's polyester running tops occupy a middle ground, they avoid the formaldehyde-resin risks of cheaper wrinkle-resistant cotton blends but lack the chemical disclosure of certified organic or Oeko-Tex Standard 100 alternatives. Nike's Dri-FIT is widely used and generally performs well, but competitors like Patagonia and Allbirds have published PFAS phase-out commitments or use certified low-chemical treatments. For runners seeking minimal chemical exposure, certified moisture-wicking alternatives exist but are often pricier or less available at scale.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water (under 40°C) with mild detergent before first wear to reduce any surface coating residue. Avoid fabric softeners and high heat (tumble dry low or air dry), as heat may increase off-gassing and degrade the finish. Machine wash with other synthetics, not with heavily soiled items. Replace after 2-3 years of regular use or if the water-repellent finish noticeably degrades (water no longer beads), as a worn coating may shed more microfibers. If you have chemical sensitivities or are concerned about PFAS, consider requesting Nike's treatment details or switching to a certified-low-chemical brand.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nike has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Basic cotton tee, lower PFAS concern with no waterproofing.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Relaxed Fit Midweight Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

100% cotton, no water-repellent finish

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, plain cotton tee with no water-repellent coating treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Carhartt Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Color Enhanced Long Sleeve T-Shirt

100% cotton long-sleeve shirt

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
🎨

Azo dyes and dye residuals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, bare cotton apparel with no added treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.