PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Pop Weaver Kettle Corn Microwave Popcorn

Pop Weaver · Microwave Popcorn

Pop Weaver Kettle Corn Microwave Popcorn

Poor

Likely grease-resistant coating; PFAS risk uncertain without disclosure.

Verdict · SkipMicrowave popcorn bag likely contains PFAS-based grease coating; no brand disclosure on composition or PFAS use. Low concern if used as directed; concern arises from lack of transparency.

Microwave popcorn bags typically use grease-resistant coatings to prevent oil leakage. Pop Weaver makes no public PFAS claims or disclosures about their bag materials.

The better-graded swap

Quaker Butter Popcorn Rice Cakes

Quaker

Quaker Butter Popcorn Rice Cakes

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper-based microwave popcorn bag, likely with grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Pop Weaver Kettle Corn Microwave Popcorn is made of, ingredients and materials

Pop Weaver kettle corn microwave popcorn is packaged in a paper-based bag with an internal grease-resistant coating designed to contain oil and prevent bag failure during microwave heating. This type of coating is often fluorochemical-based (PFAS) to achieve grease repellency, though Pop Weaver has not publicly disclosed the specific chemistry. The bag's lining may also contain minor additives or sealants that migrate into food when heated, particularly fats and oils that act as carriers for coating components.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Microwave popcorn bags typically use PFAS-based coatings for grease repellency. Pop Weaver has not disclosed the specific composition, making confirmation impossible without independent testing. Migration into food is most likely during microwave heating, especially with fatty products.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Paper-based microwave bags may contain adhesives, sealants, or other additives in addition to the primary grease-resistant layer. Heat and oil contact can promote migration of minor components. Risk is generally low with single-use heating and proper temperature control.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⏳

Thermal degradation of bag material

If the bag is overheated or the internal coating is damaged, the paper substrate can char or the lining can break down, potentially releasing volatile compounds or fragments. Proper microwave heating (following package instructions) minimizes this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No specific information is on record indicating BPA or BPS use in Pop Weaver microwave popcorn bags. Modern food-contact adhesives in this product class have largely phased out BPA, but brand-specific disclosure is not available.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic generation from bag degradation

Microplastics are not a documented concern with intact, single-use microwave popcorn bags when used as intended. Risk would only arise if the bag were damaged, overheated, or fragmented before or during cooking, which is outside normal use.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Pop Weaver (owned by American Popcorn Company) has not issued public statements on PFAS use, fluorochemical sourcing, or third-party testing of microwave popcorn bags. The brand does not list certifications such as PFAS-free on packaging or marketing materials. No recalls or safety violations specific to this product are on record, but the absence of transparency on coating composition is the primary concern.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional microwave popcorn bags rely on grease-resistant coatings, the majority of which historically contained legacy PFAS compounds. Some premium or eco-focused brands (e.g., Organic Valley, smaller specialty popcorn makers) have begun shifting to non-fluorochemical or certified PFAS-free alternatives, though these remain less common. Pop Weaver's silence on this issue places it in the majority of mainstream popcorn brands that have not committed to PFAS-free transitions.

If you buy it

Use the product according to package directions; do not overheat the bag, as elevated temperatures may increase migration of coating components into food. The bag is single-use and not designed for reheating. Store unopened bags in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight or moisture, which can degrade the coating and increase potential leaching. If the bag shows visible damage, grease staining on the exterior, or odor upon opening, discard it.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pop Weaver has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Microwave Popcorn

Quaker Butter Popcorn Rice Cakes

Quaker

Butter Popcorn Rice Cakes

70GoodPFAS grade
  • puffed rice cakes in paperboard packaging
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Mold or bacterial growth in packaging
2 Packs Trader Joe's Synergistically Seasoned Popcorn 5.5 Oz Each Pack

Trader Joe's

2 Packs Trader Joe's Synergistically Seasoned Popcorn 5.5 Oz Each Pack

70GoodPFAS grade
  • paperboard popcorn bag, grease-resistant interior lining
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Moisture and mold risk if bag is compromised
Wabash Valley Farms Sweet

Wabash Valley

Farms Sweet

70GoodPFAS grade
  • paper-based food packaging with standard coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Ink migration (printing on exterior or interior)

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More microwave popcorn grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.