PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall77/ 100Excellent
Rex TK-2251 Klister

Rex · Ski & Sports Wax

Rex TK-2251 Klister

Excellent

Lower concern. Hydrocarbon wax formulations typically avoid PFAS.

Verdict · BuyHydrocarbon wax klister with no established safety concerns; standard ski product category with minimal toxicological risk profile.

This hydrocarbon ski klister has no evidence of PFAS-containing Teflon-family coating coatings or treatments in this product type.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

hydrocarbon wax-based ski klister

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during application

Hydrocarbon-wax klisters release solvents when warmed for application; prolonged exposure in poorly ventilated spaces may cause respiratory or neurological irritation. Rex does not publicly quantify VOC content, so individual batch composition is not verifiable.

70/ 100
⚠️

Ingestion risk (accidental or child)

Klister products are not food-grade and contain solvents and additives not intended for oral intake. While acute toxicity from small incidental ingestion is likely low, the product should be kept out of reach of children.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100

Skin irritation or allergic contact dermatitis

No established cases of dermatitis linked to Rex TK-2251 or similar hydrocarbon klisters are documented. Resin components can theoretically irritate sensitive skin, but incidence appears negligible in this product class.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Mineral waxes used in ski products are typically refined to industrial purity and not known to harbor lead, cadmium, or arsenic. No third-party testing of Rex klister for trace metals is publicly available.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Coating or residue adhesion to skin or equipment

Klister's tacky nature means residue adheres to skin and skis; this is by design and poses no direct toxicological hazard, though prolonged skin contact may increase irritation risk in sensitive individuals.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Rex TK-2251 Klister is a hydrocarbon wax-based ski wax formulated for wet, icy snow conditions. Klister products are typically blends of mineral waxes, resins, and solvents designed to remain tacky at warmer temperatures where traditional hard waxes fail. The hydrocarbon base (as opposed to fluorocarbon or synthetic additives) means the product avoids certain classes of persistent additives, though volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are present during application.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rex is a Norwegian ski wax manufacturer with decades of market presence and no known product recalls or safety violations on record. The brand does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient specifications or third-party safety certifications for this product line. No documented controversies regarding heavy metals, carcinogens, or allergens have been identified in available sources.

How it compares in its category

Rex klister occupies a conventional position in the ski wax market; comparable products (Rode, Swix, Toko) share similar hydrocarbon-wax architectures and present analogous hazard profiles. Klister products as a category carry lower chemical complexity than some performance additives in premium hard waxes. No evidence suggests Rex formulations deviate toward higher-risk additives relative to category norms.

If you buy it

Apply klister in well-ventilated spaces to minimize inhalation of volatile compounds released during warming and application. Store away from heat and direct sunlight to prevent degradation of the wax matrix. Wash hands after use to avoid skin contact with residues. Replace when the product becomes overly hard, separates, or loses tackiness, typically after one season of regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rex has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Sports Wax

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
⚠️

Combustion by-products during hot application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Swix PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Swix

PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Hydrocarbon wax blend (paraffin/synthetic hydrocarbon base)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from heating

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation of wax dust during application

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Maplus Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

Maplus

Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

ski wax base, fluorine-free formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Hydrocarbon volatiles and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

More ski & sports wax grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.