PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good

RhinoShield · Waterproof Phone Cases

Rhinoshield Cell Phone Accessories

Excellent

Skip until brand discloses materials and PFAS status.

Verdict · Buy with careThermoplastic polyurethane phone accessories carry low concern for most hazards, but material identity and PFAS disclosure gaps warrant cautious use and brand transparency push.

RhinoShield cell phone cases use common durable polymers, but the brand provides no public disclosure of PFAS content or testing. Material composition remains vague across product lines.

Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Thermoplastic polyurethane, polycarbonate, or rubber blend (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Rhinoshield Cell Phone Accessories is made of, ingredients and materials

RhinoShield accessories are stated to use thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), polycarbonate, or rubber blends, but the brand does not specify which product uses which material or confirm exact formulations. TPU is a synthetic elastomer that resists degradation better than many soft plastics and does not routinely leach BPA or phthalates under normal phone-use conditions. However, the ambiguity about actual material composition and any additives (colorants, UV stabilizers, slip agents) limits assessment of specific chemical risks.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

New TPU accessories may emit volatile compounds (solvents, plasticizers) for the first days to weeks of use, especially in warm conditions. Airing out new cases in a well-ventilated area and avoiding skin contact with warm, newly opened cases can reduce inhalation or absorption; the risk is temporary and not specific to RhinoShield but inherent to TPU production.

70/ 100
🫧

Degradation and microplastic shedding over time

TPU and rubber blends can degrade when exposed to prolonged UV light, high heat, or repeated flexing, potentially shedding microparticles. Cases worn for multiple years in outdoor conditions or subject to extreme temperature swings may fragment; replacement every 2-3 years or upon visible wear is prudent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🍼

BPA & bisphenols

TPU is not a known source of BPA or common phthalates under normal room-temperature use. No recalls or published safety alerts link RhinoShield TPU cases to phthalate or BPA migration into food or skin contact.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No test results or recalls document lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in RhinoShield case dyes or stabilizers. However, the brand's lack of PFAS or heavy metal disclosure means potential hazards are not ruled out by published data.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Skin sensitization or contact dermatitis

No reports of allergic reactions or dermatitis from RhinoShield cases are on record. TPU is generally considered low-irritant, but formulation additives (antistatic agents, release agents) are not disclosed and individual sensitivity varies.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

RhinoShield has not publicly disclosed PFAS status, material safety certifications (such as SGS testing for heavy metals or plasticizer content), or manufacturing safety standards. The brand markets durability and protection but does not address chemical transparency, third-party testing results, or response to consumer concerns about off-gassing or leaching. This silence on material provenance is the primary disclosure gap; no major safety recalls are on record for RhinoShield phone accessories.

How it compares in its category

Phone case and accessory materials span rigid polycarbonate, TPU, silicone, and rubber blends. TPU is middle-ground, more stable than soft PVC but less inert than silicone or hard polycarbonate. RhinoShield cases are positioned as drop-protection premium products and compete with Spigen, OtterBox, and Casetify. Few brands in this category disclose full PFAS testing; RhinoShield's silence on composition is not unique, but lack of third-party certification (e.g., Oeko-Tex, REACH compliance statements) is a competitive weakness among transparency-conscious buyers.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged storage in direct sunlight or high heat (above 50 C / 122 F), as TPU can soften and off-gas volatile compounds. Do not heat or microwave the case with the phone. Wash with lukewarm water and mild soap if visibly soiled; do not use harsh solvents. Replace the case if you notice discoloration, sticky residue, or persistent odor, which may indicate additive leaching or degradation. Consider requesting PFAS and heavy metal test reports from the brand before purchase if chemical transparency is a priority.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
RhinoShield has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Rhinoshield Cell Phone Accessories?

Pela

Flaxstic Compostable Phone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE✓ EWG Verified
  • Flax fiber and plant-based resin blend, compostable
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Coating degradation and durability over time

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Pela

Amazon.com: Pela Phone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE✓ Cradle to Cradle Certified
  • plant-based bioplastic (flax and other plant fibers)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Thermal degradation and warping

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Pela

Amazon.com: Pela: IPhone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ Made SAFE Certified
  • Plant-based bioplastic (compostable blend)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Bioplastic degradation and microparticle shedding

More waterproof phone cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.