PFAS100/ 100Excellent
Overall88/ 100Excellent

Pela · Waterproof Phone Cases

Amazon.com: Pela Phone Case

Excellent

Low PFAS concern. Pela makes verifiable PFAS-free phone cases.

Verdict · BuyPlant-based bioplastic with verified PFAS-free status and no established hazards; appropriate for phone protection use.

Pela cases use plant-based bioplastics, hold MADE SAFE certification, and the brand explicitly claims PFAS-free formulation. Third-party verification supports lower concern.

Brand says: “PFAS-free, MADE SAFE certified”

✓ MADE SAFE✓ Cradle to Cradle Certified
Find it on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

plant-based bioplastic (flax and other plant fibers)

Brand disclosure

Third-party verified PFAS-free

Lab data

No PFAS found in testing

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Amazon.com: Pela Phone Case is made of, ingredients and materials

Pela cases use a proprietary plant-based bioplastic blend incorporating flax fibers and other plant materials, designed to replace petroleum-derived polycarbonate or TPU. This composition aims to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and improve end-of-life biodegradability compared to conventional phone cases. Plant fiber reinforcement can provide comparable impact absorption for typical drop heights while remaining lighter than mineral-filled or metal alternatives.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
⏳

Thermal degradation and warping

Plant-based bioplastics typically have lower glass transition temperatures than conventional polymers; sustained heat from direct sunlight or proximity to warm surfaces may cause softening or permanent shape loss.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fiber matrix

Plant fiber reinforcement can shed fine particles if the resin matrix degrades or fibers are damaged; direct skin contact risk is minimal on a phone case, but microscopic debris in dust is not ruled out over extended use.

70/ 100
⏳

Reduced impact protection over time

Plant fiber composites may experience faster degradation of shock-absorbing properties than conventional rigid plastics; lifespan for reliable drop protection may be shorter than traditional phone cases, though typical use over 12-24 months is not adversely documented.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Third-party PFAS-free verification

A third party reports verifying this product as PFAS-free.

100/ 100
✅

No PFAS found in lab test

No PFAS detected in independent testing.

100/ 100
✅

Dye or additive leachates (natural or synthetic)

Pela has not disclosed the colorant or additive package in published materials; no recalls or complaints related to skin irritation or chemical residue transfer to hands are on record, but full ingredient transparency is not available.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Plant-based biopolyester resins can contain minor formaldehyde residues; Pela has not published formaldehyde test data or upper limits. No complaints linking cases to respiratory or skin irritation have been established.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Pela publishes material sourcing and has third-party verified their PFAS-free claim, a transparency step most phone case makers do not take. The brand has not faced established product recalls or widely documented safety controversies in the phone case category. They disclose use of plant-based inputs but detailed ingredient documentation beyond fiber type and resin family is not publicly exhaustive.

How it compares in its category

Most phone cases use virgin or recycled polycarbonate, TPE, or rubber blends with no PFAS disclosure and minimal transparency on coatings or additives. Pela's plant-based approach and explicit PFAS verification place it in a small, higher-disclosure segment. Plant fiber cases are less established than silicone or hard plastic in long-term durability testing, but early field reports suggest comparable performance for 1-2 years of typical use.

If you buy it

Store away from direct sunlight and heat above 140F (60C), as plant-based plastics can soften or warp faster than petroleum polymers. Inspect the case periodically for fiber exposure or surface cracking; replace if structural integrity appears compromised. Clean gently with mild soap and water; avoid harsh solvents or abrasive scrubbing. Expect potential discoloration over 12-24 months as natural plant pigments weather.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 88% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
Independent test found none
Brand statement
Pela has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof phone cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.