PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall20/ 100Bad
SpiderWire Stealth Translucent Fishing Line

Spiderwire · Fishing Line

SpiderWire Stealth Translucent Fishing Line

Good

Insufficient data. Braided fishing line coatings often undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipFishing line poses minimal established chemical hazards; PFAS coating status unknown. Use with standard precautions; avoid skin contact with worn line.

SpiderWire does not publicly disclose PFAS information or coating materials for this braided synthetic fiber line. Many synthetic fishing lines use Teflon-family coating coatings, but no independent testing confirms presence or absence.

The better-graded swap

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Ande Monofilament

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Braided synthetic fiber, coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What SpiderWire Stealth Translucent Fishing is made of, ingredients and materials

SpiderWire Stealth is a braided synthetic fiber line, typically polyethylene or nylon blended with other polymers, with an undisclosed surface coating marketed for low visibility. The coating composition is not publicly specified by the manufacturer, which limits assessment of potential leachables or durability risks. Braided construction traps water and microparticles; coatings can degrade with UV exposure and mechanical stress, potentially shedding particles into aquatic environments.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed coating additives and potential leachables

Spiderwire does not publicly identify the coating formula applied to this line. Braided synthetic coatings may contain slip agents, UV stabilizers, or antimicrobial compounds not listed; their migration into skin or aquatic environments during use is not characterized.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

20/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Fishing line coatings are commonly treated with PFAS-based water- and soil-repellent compounds to improve durability and low-visibility properties. Spiderwire's silence on this ingredient leaves PFAS presence unconfirmed but not ruled out; see separate PFAS assessment.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Skin sensitization from handling

Braided lines with undisclosed additives may cause mild contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Direct prolonged skin contact with degraded line fragments carries low but uncharacterized risk from unknown coating residues.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No public record of cadmium, lead, or other heavy-metal pigments in Spiderwire line dyes. Translucent gray colorants are typically organic or titanium-based; no safety concerns are documented in available literature.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Spiderwire (owned by Pure Fishing) does not publicly disclose coating chemistry, PFAS status, or independent safety certifications for this product line. The brand has no documented public controversies regarding chemical safety in fishing line, but silence on coating composition is standard across most fishing line manufacturers. No third-party testing or materials transparency statements are available in the public record.

How it compares in its category

Most braided fishing lines share the same disclosure gap regarding coatings and potential additives. Monofilament alternatives (single-strand nylon) typically avoid braided complexity but offer different performance trade-offs. Fluorocarbon lines are known to use fluorine-based polymers; Stealth's polymer blend is less transparent but likely similar in environmental profile to standard braided synthetics.

If you buy it

Rinse hands after handling, especially if line is visibly frayed or degraded, as coating particles may shed. Store in cool, dry conditions away from direct sunlight to minimize UV-driven coating breakdown. Replace line annually or after heavy use to reduce accumulation of worn particles in tackle boxes. Dispose of spent line in solid waste, not water systems, to avoid microplastic transport.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spiderwire has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Fishing Line

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Monofilament

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic shedding during use
Ande Premium Monofilament (Bulk) 100LB BY THE YARD

Ande

Premium Monofilament (Bulk) 100LB BY THE YARD

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic fragmentation
Ande Premium Green 1/4 Spool

Ande

Premium Green 1/4 Spool

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Monofilament nylon fishing line
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • UV degradation and polymer brittleness

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More fishing line grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.