PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Blue Sky Paper Straws

Straws PAPER · Paper Straws

Blue Sky Paper Straws

Poor

Don't buy until coating transparency improves; paper straws often use PFAS-based water barriers.

Verdict · SkipPaper straws with undisclosed water-resistant coating present PFAS concern; non-PFAS hazards minimal if used as intended, but coating transparency critical.

Paper straws require water-resistant coatings, which manufacturers often make with PFAS-based Teflon-family coating. Blue Sky makes no disclosure about coating chemistry.

The better-graded swap

World Centric Kraft Paper Straws

World Centric

World Centric Kraft Paper Straws

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

paper with water-resistant coating (composition unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Coating composition undisclosed; paper straw coatings most commonly rely on fluorochemical barriers unless explicitly stated otherwise. Manufacturer silence on this widely scrutinized issue suggests probable PFAS use.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

Coating degradation and unknown leachables

No public data on coating durability or identity of byproducts released during wear/heating. Scratched or peeling coating may shed microparticles; whether these are inert or contain residual chemicals is unknown.

70/ 100
⚠️

Microbiological growth (internal tube)

Paper fiber structure traps moisture; if not dried promptly or stored damp, internal fungal or bacterial biofilm can develop. This is not unique to this brand but a general paper straw risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Ink or dye in printing (if present)

No public reports of toxic inks or dyes in Blue Sky straws. If product is printed with azo dyes or heavy-metal-based pigments, this would be a concern, but no evidence of non-compliance is on record.

95/ 100

Allergen from additives in coating or adhesives

Undisclosed coating and adhesive chemistry means potential trace allergens (e.g., formaldehyde releasers, epoxy residues) are unconfirmed. Individuals with sensitivities should request material safety data sheet from manufacturer.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Blue Sky Paper Straws are paper substrate with an unspecified water-resistant coating. The coating composition is the critical unknown, water-resistant barriers on paper straws are frequently PFAS-based (fluorochemicals) or, less commonly, polyhydroxy alkanoates or wax blends. Without manufacturer disclosure, you cannot confirm whether this product uses legacy PFAS, newer short-chain PFAS, or PFAS-free alternatives. The paper itself poses minimal leaching risk under normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Straws PAPER (the manufacturer) has not publicly disclosed coating composition or PFAS testing results in available sources. The brand maintains a generic product page without material transparency statements or third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, EU Ecolabel, or PFAS-free claims). This silence on a widely known industry problem suggests either use of conventional PFAS coatings or lack of market pressure to differentiate; either way, the omission itself is a red flag for consumers prioritizing safety transparency.

How it compares in its category

Paper straw market has bifurcated, premium brands (e.g., Footprint, some Aardvark lines) now market PFAS-free coatings explicitly; budget and unbranded alternatives remain opaque. Blue Sky occupies the middle tier without differentiation messaging, which typically correlates with reliance on cheaper, older PFAS formulations. Reusable stainless-steel or glass straws eliminate coating leaching entirely but introduce care burden; bamboo straws have less robust water resistance data.

If you buy it

Use in room-temperature or warm (not hot) beverages only; prolonged contact with hot liquids can accelerate coating degradation and leaching. Replace straws visibly after 6-12 months of use or immediately if coating is scratched, cracked, or peeling. Rinse immediately after use to prevent mold inside the tube. Do not reuse for hot drinks or acidic beverages (citrus, vinegar) without documented PFAS-free certification.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Straws PAPER has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Paper Straws

Aardvark Paper Straws

Aardvark

Paper Straws

paper (uncoated or standard coating)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
⚠️

Mold or microbial growth from moisture

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Paper fragmentation ingestion

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern choice; standard paper straws typically avoid PFAS, but Aardvark makes no explicit claim.

Starting grade for this product type

hoffmaster Jumbo Aardvark Paper Straws

Aardvark

hoffmaster Jumbo Aardvark Paper Straws

paper (untreated or minimal processing)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade62Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial contamination (mold, bacteria)

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern choice; paper straws avoid typical PFAS coatings but verify batch if concerned.

Starting grade for this product type

Aardvark Paper Drinking Straws 600 Pieces In Box

Aardvark

Paper Drinking Straws 600 Pieces In Box

Paper (unbleached or chlorine-free certified)

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
⚠️

Bleaching residues (chlorine-based)

Limited concern

70
🍳

Water-resistance coating composition

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial contamination during storage

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; plain paper straws are not a typical PFAS vector, but verify if any water-resistance coating is applied.

Starting grade for this product type

More paper straws grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.