PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall18/ 100Bad
Thunderbolt Plus 40

· Ski & Sports Wax

Thunderbolt Plus 40

Poor

Ski wax likely contains fluorocarbons. Swix disclosure unclear.

Verdict · SkipFluorocarbon ski wax with unclear PFAS disclosure; functional product but requires informed use and disposal awareness.

Thunderbolt Plus 40 is a high-fluorine ski wax. Swix does not disclose PFAS status, though performance waxes commonly use fluorocarbons for speed.

The better-graded swap

Maxiglide Downhill Quick Wax

Maxiglide

Maxiglide Downhill Quick Wax

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

wax-based ski base with possible fluorocarbon top coat

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Heating or abrading fluorinated wax releases dust and aerosols; acute respiratory irritation is rare but chronic low-level exposure concerns remain poorly studied in recreational users.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Dust inhalation during application

Dry wax application and cork rubbing generate fine particles; occupational ski technicians with chronic exposure may face cumulative respiratory burden, though short-term recreational use poses minimal risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Paraffin wax thermal stability

Paraffin wax base does not degrade significantly at normal ski-ironing temperatures (130-160C); no established toxicity risk from base wax itself at these temperatures.

95/ 100

Leaching or skin contact

Ski wax does not leach into food or skin during normal use; direct skin contact causes no documented irritation or sensitization.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Thunderbolt Plus 40 is a wax-based ski base conditioner formulated for cold snow conditions, likely containing a paraffin or synthetic hydrocarbon wax core with a fluorocarbon top coat. Fluorocarbons in ski waxes improve glide and water repellency by reducing friction, but fluorinated compounds raise PFAS concerns when wax is applied, heated, or abraded during skiing. The base wax itself (paraffin/synthetic) poses minimal acute toxicity, but the fluorocarbon component is the material of concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Swix has not published detailed ingredient disclosure or PFAS-phase-out commitments on publicly available channels. The company manufactures performance ski products without transparent labeling of fluorocarbon content or fluorine percentage. No major safety recalls or regulatory actions specific to Thunderbolt Plus 40 are documented, but the broader ski wax industry has faced increasing scrutiny over fluorocarbon use, particularly in Alpine countries where some fluorinated waxes are restricted or discouraged.

How it compares in its category

Most cold-weather ski waxes on the market contain fluorocarbons for performance; Thunderbolt Plus 40 is typical in this regard. Fluorocarbon-free alternatives exist (paraffin-only or plant-based waxes) but generally offer reduced glide in very cold or icy conditions. Swix's positioning is mid-to-premium performance; competitors like Toko and Briko also use fluorinated products without explicit PFAS reduction programs.

If you buy it

Apply wax in well-ventilated spaces or outdoors; fluorocarbon wax dust and fumes from ironing should not be inhaled directly. Store in a cool, dry place away from children; ski wax is not toxic if ingested in tiny amounts but is not food-safe. Dispose of old wax in household waste or specialty sports recycling; do not burn or incinerate. Consider rotating with fluorocarbon-free waxes for lower-consequence training days to limit cumulative exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Ski & Sports Wax

Swix PS10 Yellow Wax

Swix

PS10 Yellow Wax

Hydrocarbon-based ski wax (paraffin/synthetic blend)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade84Excellent
⚠️

Combustion by-products during hot application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin and eye contact irritation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Ingestion toxicity (accidental exposure)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microabrasive particulates from worn base or scraping

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Swix PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Swix

PS7 Violet Ski Snowboard Glide Wax

Hydrocarbon wax blend (paraffin/synthetic hydrocarbon base)

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from heating

Limited concern

70
💨

Inhalation of wax dust during application

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

Maplus Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

Maplus

Arctic Base Fluor Free 1 kg

ski wax base, fluorine-free formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
💨

Hydrocarbon volatiles and inhalation risk

Limited concern

70
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Brand claims PFAS-free (unverified)

More ski & sports wax grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.