PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall32/ 100Poor
Tamrac Jazz Zoom 23 v2.0 Camera Holster

Tamrac · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Tamrac Jazz Zoom 23 v2.0 Camera Holster

Poor

Camera holster probably has water-resistant treatment but PFAS status uncertain.

Verdict · SkipCamera holster with unknown PFAS treatment; no other major hazards documented. Verify water-repellent coating composition with retailer before purchase if concerned.

Tamrac keeps silent about PFAS and water-repellent coating chemistry in this holster. Nylon camera bags often receive water-repellent coating coatings that may contain PFAS, though no lab work confirms it.

The better-graded swap

EDGE Pro Water Housing Sony FX3 / FX30 Rental

Aquatech

EDGE Pro Water Housing Sony FX3 / FX30 Rental

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/synthetic fabric with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon with water-repellent coating finish commonly uses PFOA or PFAS alternatives for water resistance. Tamrac does not disclose chemistry; PFAS presence is likely but unconfirmed for this specific product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

Over years of outdoor use and washing, water-repellent coating coatings can degrade and potentially shed particles. Risk is low for a small holster and minimal with proper hand washing care.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Dye migration or leachables from synthetic fabric

Nylon dyes used in camera gear are not typically linked to heavy metal contamination or formaldehyde issues. No safety data suggests risk during normal handling of a camera holster.

95/ 100

Volatile organic compound off-gassing

New nylon holsters may have slight plastic odor from manufacturing, but no documented VOC or formaldehyde hazard from this product class.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Jazz Zoom 23 v2.0 is constructed from nylon with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating coatings are applied to synthetic fabrics to shed moisture without full waterproofing, but the specific chemistry of Tamrac's water-repellent coating treatment is not disclosed publicly. Nylon itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low toxicity risk under normal use, but the water-repellent coating chemical additives are the primary concern for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

Tamrac, owned by Tamrac Inc., does not publicly disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating formulation details for its camera bags and holsters. The company has no published statement on PFAS use, alternatives, or testing. No recalls or safety controversies specific to this model are on record. For a camera accessory brand, Tamrac maintains a standard industry profile with minimal third-party safety certification or transparency beyond basic product specifications.

How it compares in its category

Camera holsters and slings commonly use nylon with water-repellent coating treatments; this is standard practice across brands including Peak Design, Lowepro, and others. Most manufacturers do not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Alternatives using untreated cotton canvas or polyester exist but offer less water resistance. The Jazz Zoom 23 v2.0 sits at the middle tier of the market in terms of both durability claims and transparency.

If you buy it

Use the holster as intended for camera protection and occasional outdoor exposure. Do not machine wash in hot water, as heat can potentially degrade coatings and fibers. Hand rinse with cool water if needed and air dry completely. Replace when stitching fails or material tears, not due to chemical degradation from normal wear. If water repellency fades over years of use, the nylon base remains functional but less protective.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tamrac has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.