PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall28/ 100Poor
Think Tank Hydrophobia D 24-70 Rain Cover

Think Tank Photo · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Hydrophobia D 24-70 Rain Cover

Poor

Camera rain cover with unknown waterproof treatment; PFAS composition unclear.

Verdict · SkipPolyurethane-nylon rain cover with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry; PFAS status unknown but common in water treatments. If maintained, the coating presents lower concern; if coating degrades, risk increases.

Think Tank Hydrophobia rain covers use polyurethane-coated nylon with water-repellent finish, but the brand makes no public statement on PFAS use or alternatives. Many waterproof textiles employ PFAS-based water-repellent coating.

The better-graded swap

Peak Design Everyday Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

Peak Design

Peak Design Everyday Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyurethane-coated nylon, water-repellent coating-treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Polyurethane coating degradation and VOC release

PU-coated textiles can break down over years or with UV exposure, potentially releasing volatile organic compounds. This risk is low in normal camera bag use but increases with age and storage in heat or sunlight.

70/ 100
⚠️

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) chemistry unknown

The water-repellent coating finish is almost certainly fluorine-based (PFAS or alternatives), but Think Tank does not disclose which. This prevents assessment of whether the product contains legacy PFAS like PFOA or newer forever chemicals.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing during storage in heat

Polyurethane can emit weak odors when warm. If stored in a hot car or warehouse, PU coatings may release low levels of volatile compounds. Direct skin contact risk is minimal since it is not worn on body, but ventilation during storage is prudent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Nylon substrate degradation

Nylon fabric itself is stable and non-toxic in normal use. Degradation is primarily cosmetic (pilling, tears) rather than a health hazard, though microfiber shedding from worn nylon is theoretically possible but not documented as a concern in camera gear.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Rain covers do not use dyes, pigments, or coatings that typically contain lead, cadmium, or allergenic substances. No recalls or safety data suggest this product poses heavy metal or contact dermatitis risk.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This cover is nylon fabric bonded to a polyurethane (PU) backing, treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. Polyurethane itself is a stable polymer when cured, but the water-repellent coating treatment is the unknown variable. water-repellent coating finishes are historically either PFAS-based (PFOA/GenX precursors) or fluorine-free alternatives, and Think Tank has not publicly disclosed which chemistry they use. The nylon substrate poses minimal risk in normal use but can degrade under UV or heat, potentially releasing trapped volatile organics if the coating flakes.

The brand's record and disclosure

Think Tank Photo is a camera gear specialist with no publicly available certifications (Bluesign, GOTS, OEKO-TEX, or PFAS-free claims) for this product line. The company has not issued statements on water-repellent coating chemistry, PFAS avoidance, or material sourcing transparency. This silence is typical of niche camera accessory makers, but it means consumers cannot verify whether the water-repellent coating is PFAS-based or uses alternative chemistries. No recalls or safety controversies are on record for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Camera rain covers are a small, unregulated niche. Most competitors (Peak Design, Lowepro, generic brands) use similar PU-coated nylon with undisclosed water-repellent coating treatments. Think Tank's version is mid-range in price and durability reputation. Unlike apparel or cookware, rain covers face less scrutiny from safety bodies, so industry-wide PFAS/hazard data is sparse. The lack of transparency is industry-standard, not a Think Tank-specific weakness, but it remains a transparency gap.

If you buy it

Store dry and out of direct sunlight to slow UV degradation of the polyurethane coating. Rinse gently with cool water after salt spray or sandy use; do not machine wash or dry clean. Inspect annually for peeling, cracks, or sticky residue on the interior; replace if coating separates, as degraded PU can off-gas volatile organic compounds. Do not expose to heat sources (car dashboards in summer, direct flame) as PU can soften and emit fumes above 70-80 degrees Celsius.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Think Tank Photo has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.