PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall14/ 100Bad
S-ZONE Waterproof Camera Bag for DSLR/SLR

· Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

S-ZONE Waterproof Camera Bag for DSLR/SLR

Poor

Avoid; waterproof camera bags often use PFAS-based coatings.

Verdict · SkipPFAS-likely waterproof coating plus silent brand stance on chemical disclosure make alternatives with lower concern preferable.

S-ZONE waterproof bags lack PFAS disclosure and transparency about coating chemistry. Waterproof coatings on camera bags typically use water-repellent coating treatments, commonly PFAS-based.

The better-graded swap

Nikon waterproof case set WP-CP2

Nikon

Nikon waterproof case set WP-CP2

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester/nylon with unspecified waterproof coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
🍳

Unspecified waterproof coating chemistry

The brand does not disclose whether the coating is PFAS-based, PFAS-free, or a fluorine-free alternative. Given the budget positioning and industry norms, PFAS durable water repellents (DWRs) are statistically probable. No testing data is publicly available.

20/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from coating off-gassing

Polyester-nylon fabrics with waterproof coatings can off-gas odorous volatile compounds during the first weeks of use, especially in warm, enclosed spaces. The unspecified coating formulation makes severity unpredictable. Typical remedies, air in sunlight for 24-48 hours before use.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

Budget waterproof coatings on nylon degrade faster than premium alternatives, particularly after UV exposure or friction. Degraded coating fragments may shed onto equipment stored inside. No specific brand history exists, but this is a category-wide wear pattern.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester fabric

Polyester and nylon in low-cost bags may use azo dyes, though S-ZONE specifically has no reported violations or testing data. Most polyester textiles sold in Western markets comply with REACH restrictions on azos, but verification depends on supply chain transparency that TravelMate does not provide.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Camera bags typically do not require flame retardants. No evidence exists that S-ZONE adds antimicrobial or FR treatments. Absence of treatment is generally favorable, but lack of disclosure prevents confirmation.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

S-ZONE uses polyester and nylon with an unspecified waterproof coating, a common setup in camera bags. The coating formula is not disclosed by the brand, which is significant because waterproofing in this price tier (budget outdoor gear) typically relies on fluorinated compounds (PFAS-based durable water repellents) rather than newer alternatives. Polyester and nylon themselves are chemically stable, but the coating applied to them is the primary concern for leaching and off-gassing potential.

The brand's record and disclosure

TravelMate has no publicly available chemical disclosure statements, material safety documentation, or certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, etc.) on this product line. The brand maintains silence on waterproofing chemistry and flame-retardant treatments, which is typical of budget travel gear manufacturers but indicates low transparency standards. No major recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this specific model, but absence of disclosure is itself a red flag for buyer confidence.

How it compares in its category

Budget waterproof camera bags (under $50-80) almost universally use PFAS-based coatings because they are cheap and effective. Mid-tier alternatives (Lowepro, Manfrotto) occasionally disclose non-PFAS options or certifications. Premium bags increasingly use wax-cotton, thermoplastic urethane (TPU), or disclosed fluorine-free water repellents, though at higher cost. S-ZONE positions itself at the budget end without transparency, placing it below industry baseline for chemical accountability.

If you buy it

Avoid hand-washing in hot water or leaving in direct sunlight for extended periods, as this may accelerate coating degradation and potential leaching into stored equipment. Store in a cool, dry place; do not compress the bag tightly for months on end, as this stresses the coating seams. Replace the bag if the waterproof coating visibly cracks, peels, or becomes tacky or sticky (sign of binder breakdown). Do not store film or sensors in sealed compartments for weeks without airflow; moisture from degraded coating can corrode sensitive electronics.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.