PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
English Floral Tablecloth

Williams Sonoma · Stain-Resistant Textiles

English Floral Tablecloth

Bad

Avoid unless Williams Sonoma discloses water-repellent coating treatment chemistry.

Verdict · SkipCotton blend with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish poses unknown PFAS risk; no other significant hazards documented for this material class, but disclosure needed before confident purchase.

This cotton-blend tablecloth features stain and water-resistant coatings with no brand PFAS disclosure. Without transparency, the actual PFAS risk cannot be assessed.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton blend with stain/water-resistant finish (type undisclosed)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Williams Sonoma does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry; legacy fluorocarbon finishes commonly contain PFAS, though newer silicone alternatives exist. Risk is primarily through laundering leachate and potential skin contact, not volatilization.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Over repeated washing cycles, synthetic water-repellent coating finishes can flake or shed small particles; if finish contains PFAS-based polymers, this could increase microparticle exposure during laundering and shedding into rinse water.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or testing reports specific to Williams Sonoma tablecloths. Cotton blends may receive wrinkle-resist or sizing treatments containing low levels of formaldehyde releasers, but this is not established for this product.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes and colorant toxins

No documented issues with Williams Sonoma textiles; floral prints could theoretically use restricted azo dyes (carcinogenic amine precursors), but the brand sells primarily through US retail channels subject to CPSIA oversight.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No testing or recall history for Williams Sonoma tablecloths; floral prints do not inherently pose lead or cadmium risk in modern US-market textiles, though full certification data is absent.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tablecloth is a cotton blend with an applied stain and water-resistant finish, but Williams Sonoma does not publicly disclose the chemistry of that finish. Cotton itself is low-hazard, but the coating is the critical unknown, it could contain PFAS (legacy fluorocarbon water-repellent coating treatments) or newer alternatives like silicone or wax-based repellents. The coating's composition determines whether off-gassing, skin contact risk, or laundering leachates pose any concern.

The brand's record and disclosure

Williams Sonoma has not published a transparency statement on PFAS use in home textiles or commitment to phasing them out, placing the brand in the middle-to-lower range for disclosure relative to peers like Patagonia or Crate and Barrel. The company does not list certifications such as OEKO-TEX or GOTS on this product listing. Without direct communication from the manufacturer about the water-repellent coating treatment, there is no way to verify whether PFAS-free chemistry is used.

How it compares in its category

Most casual tablecloths skip water resistance entirely; those that include it often use non-fluorinated silicone or paraffin wax finishes, which carry lower hazard profiles. Premium brands (Pottery Barn, Restoration Hardware) also rarely disclose their water-repellent coating chemistry proactively, making this a category-wide transparency problem. If avoiding PFAS is a priority, look for tablecloths with explicit 'PFAS-free' or OEKO-TEX certification labeling.

If you buy it

Wash before first use to remove any loose finish residues or manufacturing chemicals. Use warm (not hot) water and standard detergent; very hot water or harsh bleach may degrade the coating faster. Expect the water-resistant finish to diminish gradually over 20-30 washes; this is normal and does not indicate a safety failure. If PFAS content concerns you, contact Williams Sonoma customer service to request finish composition details before ordering.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Williams Sonoma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Stain-Resistant Textiles

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

100% cotton

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast concerns

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and mold

Limited concern

70

Plain cotton tablecloth, no surface treatments, lower PFAS concern.

Starting grade for this product type

ETHAN allen Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

Ethan Allen

Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

polyester fabric with unknown finish treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

Water repellent finish degradation and leachables

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Skip pending brand verification of finish treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Ethan Allen Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

Ethan Allen

Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

upholstery fabric (composition unspecified)

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

No PFAS disclosure available from brand on this cover.

Starting grade for this product type

More stain-resistant textiles grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.