PFAS35/ 100Poor
Overall13/ 100Bad
Painted Vine Tablecloth

Williams Sonoma · Stain-Resistant Textiles

Painted Vine Tablecloth

Poor

Stain-resistant tablecloth; brand withholds treatment details.

Verdict · SkipCotton-linen blend with undisclosed stain-resistant treatment poses moderate PFAS risk; no other major hazards documented, but poor brand transparency warrants cautious use.

Cotton-linen blend with stain-resistant finish from Williams Sonoma, who won't specify the chemistry. Many fabric stain treatments use PFAS without transparency.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton/linen blend with stain-resistant finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Stain-resistant finish

Stain-resistant finishes are a common PFAS use.

80/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Stain-resistant tablecloths commonly use PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings. Williams Sonoma's silence on this treatment and lack of PFAS-free labeling suggests conventional chemistry is probable, though not confirmed.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some stain-resistant textile treatments use formaldehyde-based resins as cross-linkers. No record of this specific product using such chemistry, but it is a documented risk in similar treated natural-fiber textiles.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes

The 'Painted Vine' pattern suggests pigment printing, but no banned azo dyes are documented in Williams Sonoma textiles. Natural fiber blends and mid-market production typically avoid the most restricted azo compounds.

95/ 100

VOC off-gassing

Cotton-linen blends have minimal inherent off-gassing. Risk is limited to finish application residues, which are typically low in untreated storage.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Tablecloths are not subject to flammability regulations requiring flame retardant coatings in most jurisdictions. No evidence suggests this product is treated with flame retardants.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This tablecloth is a cotton-linen blend, which are natural cellulose fibers with low inherent toxicity. The stain-resistant finish is the chemical concern, Williams Sonoma does not specify whether this uses PFAS-based treatments (common in water-resistant textiles) or alternative chemistries. Natural fibers like cotton and linen do not off-gas volatile organic compounds the way synthetic upholstery does, making the finish the primary chemical exposure pathway.

The brand's record and disclosure

Williams Sonoma does not publicly disclose PFAS use in their textiles or commit to PFAS phase-out timelines. The company has no documented certifications (Oeko-Tex, GOTS, bluesign) for this product line that would signal independent chemical vetting. No major recalls or health controversies are on record for this specific tablecloth, but the brand's silence on stain-resistant treatments is consistent with widespread industry practice of withholding supplier information.

How it compares in its category

Stain-resistant tablecloths overwhelmingly rely on PFAS or other fluorinated compounds for water and oil repellency. Non-treated or naturally water-resistant alternatives (like raw linen or certified organic cotton) are less common at this price point. Williams Sonoma's lack of transparency places this product in the middle-to-lower tier of disclosure compared to specialty retailers that specifically label PFAS-free or GOTS-certified textiles.

If you buy it

Do not machine wash in hot water or tumble dry on high heat, as this can degrade the stain-resistant finish and potentially release volatile compounds. Wash in cool water on gentle cycle and air-dry; heat exposure is the primary risk factor for treated textiles. Plan to replace every 3-5 years as durability of stain-resistant finishes degrades with laundering. If you have concerns about PFAS exposure, contact Williams Sonoma directly to request treatment details before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Williams Sonoma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Stain-Resistant Textiles

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

Amazon Essentials Light Blue Multicolor Cotton Tablecloth

100% cotton

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and colorfast concerns

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and mold

Limited concern

70

Plain cotton tablecloth, no surface treatments, lower PFAS concern.

Starting grade for this product type

ETHAN allen Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

Ethan Allen

Millbrook/Bridgewater Cove Extension Dining Table Cover

polyester fabric with unknown finish treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

Water repellent finish degradation and leachables

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Skip pending brand verification of finish treatment.

Starting grade for this product type

Ethan Allen Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

Ethan Allen

Nod Hill Collection Covers 35"h

upholstery fabric (composition unspecified)

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade31Poor
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

High concern

20

No PFAS disclosure available from brand on this cover.

Starting grade for this product type

More stain-resistant textiles grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.