PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall59/ 100Good
Dickies Men's 873 Slim Fit Work Pants

Dickies · Stain-Resistant Professional Workwear

Dickies Men's 873 Slim Fit Work Pants

Good

Lower concern because bare cotton twill won't need PFAS treatment.

Verdict · Skip100% cotton twill with no established hazard record; lower PFAS risk; standard workwear with no major brand safety issues on file.

Dickies 873 pants are pure cotton twill with no waterproofing or stain resistance mentioned, eliminating PFAS coating risk. Bare cotton naturally avoids fluorochemical treatments.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

100% cotton twill

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Dickies Men's 873 Slim Fit Work Pants is made of, ingredients and materials

Dickies 873 pants are 100% cotton twill, a tightly woven plain-weave fabric known for durability and breathability. Cotton twill does not require water-repellent or stain-resistant chemical finishes to function, which is why PFAS contamination risk is lower than in treated work pants or outerwear. The fabric is naturally resistant to wear and does not degrade quickly, reducing the timeline for replacement and repeated chemical exposure over a garment's lifetime.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Residual dye migration and skin contact

New unwashed cotton workwear may retain loosely bound dye particles. Pre-washing before first wear is a standard precaution to remove excess dye and minimize any irritation risk, particularly for sensitive skin or prolonged contact areas.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Azo dyes

No specific azo dye restrictions or complaints are on record for Dickies 873 pants. Standard cotton workwear uses conventional dyes; if azo-based, they are typically fixed to the fiber during manufacturing and not a significant skin exposure risk in finished garments.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

100% cotton twill requires no formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resistance or crease-setting finishes. Untreated plain weave cotton does not rely on formaldehyde releasers, making this hazard class absent for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester

This product is 100% cotton, not polyester, so antimony contamination is not applicable.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Dickies 873 work pants carry no flame-retardant finish. Cotton twill is not chemically treated for flame resistance and does not pose this hazard.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Williamson-Dickie (Dickies parent) does not publicly disclose detailed chemical management policies or PFAS restrictions as of available records. The brand has no documented major safety recalls or public health controversies tied to this product line. Dickies holds no recognized third-party certifications (such as GOTS or Oeko-Tex) for chemical safety, though this does not indicate a hazard, only that independent verification is absent.

How it compares in its category

Dickies 873 work pants are standard commodity workwear comparable to Carhartt, Wrangler, and other mass-market brands. Cotton twill work pants in this price tier typically receive no special chemical treatment, putting them at lower chemical hazard risk than treated canvas, flame-retardant textiles, or water-repellent finishes. Fit and durability are the main differentiators; safety profiles are broadly similar across untreated cotton workwear.

If you buy it

Wash new pants before wearing to reduce any residual dyes or finishes. Standard cold-water washing is appropriate; hot water is unnecessary and may accelerate fade. Inspect seams and fabric integrity annually; cotton twill degrades from repeated washing over 2-3 years of heavy use, signaling replacement. No special storage or care is required; standard laundry practices are sufficient.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dickies has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More stain-resistant professional workwear grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.