Does Bambody period underwear have PFAS?
Bambody period underwear averages 36 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Bambody period underwear products graded as of October 2026, below the 48 out of 100 median for the 21 other period underwear brands graded alongside it.
Bambody period underwear averages Poor on our four-band scale. 1 of the 4 we graded is worth buying. That is above 38% of the period underwear brands we grade.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Bambody period underwear worth buying Good or better, best-graded first
- bamboo viscose or cotton blend
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes (allergen/skin sensitization). Black viscose/cotton fabrics commonly employ azo dyes, which can…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Bambody period underwear contains PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- Bamboo viscose blend with waterproof treatment (coating unspecified)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Waterproofing method is unspecified. PFAS are widely used in textile waterproofing; without…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
Bambody
Absorbent Period Panties Bamboo Rayon Leakproof Period Underwear for Women and Teens
- bamboo rayon with unspecified waterproof/leakproof coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Waterproof coating chemistry (unknown composition). The leakproof layer is not named. If PFAS-based, it poses…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- bamboo viscose with waterproof/absorbent coating, unspecified
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Bamboo viscose fabrics often receive formaldehyde-based cross-linking or water-resistant…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonBetter period underwear from other brands
Graded higher than the Bambody average of 36.
- organic cotton, waterproof backing layer
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- organic cotton blend, water-resistant gusset
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastic shedding from water-resistant barrier
- Organic cotton, wood pulp fiber
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Azo dyes and synthetic dyes
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
The same question, asked of the other period underwear brands
Best average grade first. Bambody averages 36.
See every Bambody product we grade on the Bambody brand page, or the full period underwear ranking.