Does Lola period underwear have PFAS?
Lola period underwear averages 61 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Lola period underwear products graded as of October 2026, above the 48 out of 100 median for the 21 other period underwear brands graded alongside it.
Lola period underwear averages Good on our four-band scale. 1 of the 4 we graded is worth buying. That is above 76% of the period underwear brands we grade.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Lola period underwear worth buying Good or better, best-graded first
- organic cotton with gusseted absorbent layer
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Formaldehyde / VOCs. Organic cotton still undergoes industrial finishing, dyeing, and drying processes that…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Lola period underwear contains PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- organic cotton with water-resistant treatment
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Undisclosed water-repellent treatment chemistry. The brand claims PFAS-free status but does not publicly name…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- organic cotton with water-resistant finish
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Water-repellent finish chemistry (unspecified). The brand claims PFAS-free but does not publicly disclose the…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Cotton blend with water-resistant treatment
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Water-resistant coating chemistry (unspecified). The treatment used to achieve water resistance is not…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonBetter period underwear from other brands
Graded higher than the Lola average of 61.
- organic cotton, waterproof backing layer
- A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
- Coating degradation and microparticle shedding
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- organic cotton blend, water-resistant gusset
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastic shedding from water-resistant barrier
- Organic cotton, wood pulp fiber
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Azo dyes and synthetic dyes
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
The same question, asked of the other period underwear brands
Best average grade first. Lola averages 61.
See every Lola product we grade on the Lola brand page, or the full period underwear ranking.