15Bad

Bundt Review, Is Bundt Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 1 graded product, Bundt averages Bad (15/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

At Home Nonstick Bundt Cake Pan

Bundt

At Home Nonstick Bundt Cake Pan

Nonstick coating, type unspecified

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation (if Teflon-type coating-based)

If this pan uses Teflon-type coating nonstick coating (unknown), overheating above…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle shedding

All synthetic nonstick coatings degrade with time and mechanical wear. Bundt pans show…

20
🏷️

Disclosure and accountability gaps

Bundt's refusal to publicly specify nonstick coating chemistry or certify PFAS-free…

45

High risk. Skip until Bundt discloses nonstick chemistry or offers PFAS-free assurance.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →