23Bad

Natural Value Review, Is Natural Value Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Natural Value averages Bad (23/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

King Arthur Baking Natural Half-Sheet Baking Parchment Paper

Natural Value

King Arthur Baking Natural Half-Sheet Baking Parchment Paper

paper with silicone and/or wax coating

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Unspecified coating composition means non-fluorinated silicone or wax components could…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding

Repeated use, creasing, or exposure to temperatures above manufacturer limits may cause…

70

Parchment paper coating origin unspecified; moderate PFAS risk remains uncertain.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

200 Pcs Unbleached Parchment Sheets Precut Nonstick Paper for Baking Cooking

Natural Value

200 Pcs Unbleached Parchment Sheets Precut Nonstick Paper for Baking Cooking

Unbleached parchment paper with unspecified nonstick coating

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade2Bad

Nonstick coating thermal degradation

Unspecified nonstick coating may release fumes or degrade at high temperatures (above…

70
🫧

Microplastic or coating particle shedding

Worn or damaged parchment sheets may shed coating particles into food; visual inspection…

70
🏷️

Incomplete ingredient disclosure (indirect safety concern)

Consumer reports and advocacy groups have flagged parchment paper as a common source of…

45

Unbleached parchment nonstick source unclear, contact brand for details.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →