35Poor

Tiger Review, Is Tiger Non-Toxic?

Across 3 graded products, Tiger averages Poor (35/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. 1 of its products grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Worth buying from Tiger Good or better, best-graded first

TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer

Tiger

JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer

Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Mineral and microbial buildup in heating element

Uncoated stainless steel and uncoated heating elements can accumulate mineral deposits…

70
⛏️

Stainless steel corrosion and iron leaching

Low-grade stainless steel or scratches exposing the underlying metal can theoretically…

70

Medium-high risk; no nonstick coating means minimal Teflon-family coating risk.

Starting grade for this product type

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

TIGER JNP-1000 Rice Cooker and Warmer

Tiger

JNP-1000 Rice Cooker and Warmer

Inner bowl coating, nonstick type unspecified by manufacturer

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
🫧

Nonstick coating degradation and particle shedding

Tiger does not confirm Teflon-type coating or alternative; unspecified nonstick coatings…

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching from bowl substrate

If the nonstick coating wears through, underlying aluminum in the bowl substrate may…

45
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk from overheating

If the nonstick coating is Teflon-type coating-based and the unit is used above safe…

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth in crevices and warm settings

Extended warm hold mode (typical feature of this model) creates ideal conditions for…

70

High risk; skip until Tiger discloses inner bowl coating.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

Tiger

10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

Inner cooking bowl with nonstick coating (type unspecified); aluminum/steel body

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation (nonstick coating)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating and the cooker overheats (e.g., malfunction, no…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

All nonstick coatings degrade with time and use. Visible flaking or peeling can occur…

20
🔩

Aluminum leaching from bowl interior

The nonstick coating is meant to isolate the aluminum underneath. If the coating is…

70
♾️

PFAS

Without disclosure, PFAS-based alternatives or processing aids in the coating cannot be…

70

High risk; skip unless Tiger discloses coating chemistry.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Tiger and PFAS, common questions

Does Tiger have PFAS?
We graded 3 Tiger products, averaging Poor (35/100). 1 grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
Is Tiger non-toxic?
TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer is the highest-graded Tiger product we have scored, at 75/100. It depends on the product line rather than the brand, so check the grade of the exact item you are buying.
Which Tiger products are lower concern for PFAS?
The highest-graded Tiger products we have scored are TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer. That is our model-based estimate from materials and public disclosure, not a lab test.
Which Tiger products should I avoid?
The lowest-graded Tiger products we have scored are Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY, TIGER JNP-1000 Rice Cooker and Warmer. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →