Tiger Review, Is Tiger Non-Toxic?
Tiger averages 35 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 3 Tiger products graded as of November 2026, and 1 of them reach its 70 point pass mark.
Tiger grades Poor on our four-band scale. On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. See what every brand has published about PFAS for how that compares.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Tiger products are PFAS-free? Good or better, best-graded first
- Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Mineral and microbial buildup in heating element. Uncoated stainless steel and uncoated heating elements can…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonWhich Tiger products contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- Inner cooking bowl with nonstick coating (type unspecified); aluminum/steel body
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Teflon-type coating fume inhalation (nonstick coating). If the coating is Teflon-type coating and the cooker…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Inner bowl coating, nonstick type unspecified by manufacturer
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Nonstick coating degradation and particle shedding. Tiger does not confirm Teflon-type coating or…
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonTiger and PFAS, common questions
- Does Tiger have PFAS?
- Tiger averages 35 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 3 Tiger products graded as of November 2026, and 1 of them reach its 70 point pass mark. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is Tiger non-toxic?
- TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer is the highest-graded Tiger product we have scored, at 75/100. It depends on the product line rather than the brand, so check the grade of the exact item you are buying.
- Which Tiger products are lower concern for PFAS?
- The highest-graded Tiger products we have scored are TIGER JNP-1800 10-Cup Uncooked Rice Cooker and Warmer. That is our model-based estimate from materials and public disclosure, not a lab test.
- Which Tiger products should I avoid?
- The lowest-graded Tiger products we have scored are TIGER JNP-1000 Rice Cooker and Warmer, Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →