PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

Tiger · Rice Cookers

Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY

Bad

High risk; skip unless Tiger discloses coating chemistry.

Verdict · SkipTeflon-type coating chemistry undisclosed by Tiger; nonstick rice cookers carry fume and degradation risk if overheated or scratched. Manageable with strict use discipline.

This Tiger model has a nonstick-coated inner bowl with unspecified coating material and an aluminum or steel body. Tiger provides no public disclosure of coating type or PFAS status.

The better-graded swap

Zojirushi Neuro Fuzzy Rice Cooker & Warmer

Zojirushi

Zojirushi Neuro Fuzzy Rice Cooker & Warmer

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Inner cooking bowl with nonstick coating (type unspecified); aluminum/steel body

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY is made of, ingredients and materials

The JNPS18UKY has an inner cooking bowl with a nonstick coating of unspecified chemistry. Tiger does not publicly disclose whether this is Teflon-type coating (Teflon-type), a PFAS-free alternative, or a hybrid formulation. The outer body is aluminum and stainless steel. The undisclosed coating is the primary safety concern because overheating nonstick coatings can release fumes, and degradation from scratching or acidic foods can accelerate leaching.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation (nonstick coating)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating and the cooker overheats (e.g., malfunction, no water, metal contact), fumes can be released. Tiger's silence on coating type means this risk cannot be ruled out. Proper use (always add rice and water, no dry running) substantially reduces this risk.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

All nonstick coatings degrade with time and use. Visible flaking or peeling can occur after years of use, particularly if the bowl is scratched or exposed to high heat. Ingested coating particles have limited toxicity data in humans but represent an unnecessary exposure.

20/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching from bowl interior

The nonstick coating is meant to isolate the aluminum underneath. If the coating is compromised or thin, acidic foods (tomato-based dishes, vinegar) cooked in this cooker could promote aluminum migration into food. This is a general aluminum-cookware concern, mitigated by the coating when intact.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Without disclosure, PFAS-based alternatives or processing aids in the coating cannot be ruled out. Tiger's non-disclosure stance and the product's 15/100 PFAS safety score reflect this uncertainty. Request specific coating chemistry from Tiger before purchase if PFAS-free use is a priority.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Steam and lid seal degradation

No specific seal or gasket material data is available for this model. Standard rubber or silicone gaskets used in rice cookers typically do not pose acute safety hazards but can develop mold or odor if not cleaned and dried regularly.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Tiger has not published transparency statements on nonstick coating chemistry, PFAS use, or safety certifications for this model. The company has no known public commitments to reducing PFAS use in manufacturing. Tiger produces widely used kitchen appliances and has not faced major recalled safety incidents for this specific model, but the silence on coating materials is a red flag in the current regulatory climate.

How it compares in its category

Most rice cookers in this price and capacity range (10-cup) use nonstick-coated aluminum bowls without full material transparency. Some competitors like Zojirushi and Cuckoo have begun disclosing coating details or offering stainless-steel-only options. The JNPS18UKY is typical of mid-range models in obscuring this information, making it neither unusually risky nor unusually transparent.

If you buy it

Never exceed the rice cooker's maximum fill line or use it for prolonged dry heating or high-temperature cooking. Avoid metal utensils that scratch the bowl; use wood or silicone. Replace the inner bowl if the nonstick coating visibly peels, flakes, or degrades. Hand-wash the bowl with mild soap and avoid harsh scouring. Store with the lid off to prevent condensation buildup that can degrade the coating over time.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Tiger has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Tiger 10 Cup Rice Cooker JNPS18UKY?

Instant Pot 12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker

Instant Pot

12 Cup Rice and Grain Cooker

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel pot with no nonstick coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Stainless steel corrosion and metal leaching

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Stainless steel inner pot and non-coated heating elements
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Mineral and microbial buildup in heating element

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Zojirushi Neuro Fuzzy Rice Cooker & Warmer

Zojirushi

Neuro Fuzzy Rice Cooker & Warmer

75ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Stainless steel inner pot, aluminum outer housing
  • Stainless steel nickel content

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More rice cookers grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.