Travelon Review, Is Travelon Non-Toxic?
Across 1 graded product, Travelon averages Poor (40/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
Travelon
Waterproof Smart Phone/Digital Camera Pouch
Fabric with waterproof coating, unspecified
Unspecified waterproof coating (fluorocarbon or polyurethane volatilization risk)
If coating is fluorocarbon-based, heat or aging may release volatile organic compounds…
Microplastic shedding from degraded textile coating
Waterproof coatings on fabrics can flake or degrade, especially if flexed repeatedly or…
Bacterial or mold growth in sealed wet storage
Waterproof pouches trap moisture if sealed while wet, creating an anaerobic environment…
Avoid until brand discloses waterproofing chemistry.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
Travelon and PFAS, common questions
- Does Travelon have PFAS?
- We graded 1 Travelon product, averaging Poor (40/100). None grade Good or better. Grades are model-based estimates built from published materials, ingredients and disclosures, not lab tests.
- Is Travelon non-toxic?
- No Travelon product we graded reaches Good. The best of them is Travelon Waterproof Smart Phone/Digital Camera Pouch at 40/100.
- Which Travelon products should I avoid?
- The lowest-graded Travelon products we have scored are Travelon Waterproof Smart Phone/Digital Camera Pouch. Each one links to the evidence behind its grade.
Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →