Travelon · Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases
Travelon Waterproof Smart Phone/Digital Camera Pouch
Avoid until brand discloses waterproofing chemistry.
This waterproof pouch depends on an undisclosed coating chemistry for water resistance. Travelon makes no public statement on PFAS status or third-party verification.
The better-graded swap
Samsung
Best Samsung Galaxy S25/S24/S23 Ultra Lens
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Fabric with waterproof coating, unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Travelon Waterproof Smart Camera Pouch is made of, ingredients and materials
This pouch uses an unspecified fabric with a waterproof coating, likely polyester or nylon base. The coating is the critical unknown, waterproofing typically uses either Teflon-type coating (Teflon), polyurethane, or fluorocarbon polymers. Without TravelMate disclosing the chemistry, you cannot rule out PFAS-based water repellents, which are common in consumer waterproof textiles and persist in the environment and human body. The fabric itself and adhesives/threads are secondary concerns.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Unspecified waterproof coating (fluorocarbon or polyurethane volatilization risk)
If coating is fluorocarbon-based, heat or aging may release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or monomers. Polyurethane coatings can off-gas 1,3-diphenyl urea under stress. Travelon has not disclosed which is used, so exposure risk cannot be ruled out.
Microplastic shedding from degraded textile coating
Waterproof coatings on fabrics can flake or degrade, especially if flexed repeatedly or exposed to heat. This may release microplastic particles, particularly concerning if the pouch contains food items or is stored in humid environments.
Bacterial or mold growth in sealed wet storage
Waterproof pouches trap moisture if sealed while wet, creating an anaerobic environment ideal for pathogenic mold or bacteria. This is a usage hazard, not a manufacturing defect, and applies to all pouches of this type.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
Standard fabric seams and adhesives in travel pouches may contain formaldehyde-releasing resins or azo dyes, but no specific recalls or test failures are recorded for Travelon pouches. Risk is generic to the product class, not elevated for this brand.
Source, ATSDR ↗Lead
If the pouch carries printed logos or labels, these could theoretically contain lead-based inks, but no hazard reports exist for this product. Standard consumer goods testing would flag such issues; absence of recalls suggests compliance.
Source, ATSDR ↗How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
TravelMate (Travelon) is a travel-gear manufacturer with no publicly available statement on waterproofing chemistry, PFAS use, or chemical certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, bluesign). No major safety recalls or compliance controversies appear in published records for this product line. The silence on coating composition is the red flag, not an established violation, but it prevents confident assessment.
How it compares in its category
Most waterproof phone pouches in this price range use unspecified coatings; few brands openly commit to PFAS-free alternatives. Higher-end options (e.g., Patagonia, some outdoor brands) disclose use of polyurethane or wax-based systems. Generic pouches are cheaper and equally opaque. This product is middle-of-the-road, no worse than typical, but not a leader in transparency.
If you buy it
Keep the pouch away from heat sources and direct sunlight for extended periods, as degradation of unknown coatings may release volatile compounds. Use only for short trips or emergency protection; do not rely on it as permanent storage for skin-contact items. Wash gently by hand in cool water if soiled; machine washing or heat drying risks coating breakdown. Store dry in a cool place; do not seal wet. Replace if the coating peels, cracks, or develops a chemical odor.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Travelon has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Travelon Waterproof Smart Phone/Digital Camera Pouch?
- Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- No PFAS statement found from the brand
- Glass lens (borosilicate or soda-lime glass)
- Optical coating degradation
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- Optical glass, aluminum frame, non-coated optical surfaces
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Optical glass fragility and sharp edges
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.