40Poor

Waterproof Pouch Review, Is Waterproof Pouch Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 1 graded product, Waterproof Pouch averages Poor (40/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Magnetic Waterproof Phone Pouch

Waterproof Pouch

Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Magnetic Waterproof Phone Pouch

PVC or vinyl with unspecified waterproof coating

PFAS Grade40Poor
Overall Grade14Bad
🧴

Phthalates

PVC requires plasticizers for flexibility; manufacturer does not specify phthalate-free…

70
🏷️

Undisclosed waterproof coating additives

Coating formulation is proprietary and not disclosed. Cannot rule out Teflon-family…

70
💨

PVC off-gassing and degradation

PVC can release volatile organic compounds, especially when new or stored in warm…

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

PVC is brittle and can fragment or shed microparticles if creased, stored in tight…

70

Skip. Waterproof coating composition undisclosed; PFAS risk unclear.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →