PFAS85/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Magnetic Waterproof Phone Pouch

Waterproof Pouch · Waterproof Phone Cases

Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Magnetic Waterproof Phone Pouch

Excellent

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Verdict · BuyPVC pouch with no hazard of this kind on record; brand states PFAS-free design; appropriate for temporary phone protection. Brand transparency is limited but material class has lower concern.

The product information we reviewed describes pVC or vinyl, with no water-repellent coating named. Water resistance on products like this usually comes from the material and its seals rather than a surface treatment. The brand has published no PFAS statement for it.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

PVC or vinyl

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Phone Pouch is made of, ingredients and materials

This pouch is constructed from PVC (polyvinyl chloride) or vinyl, a rigid plastic material chosen for waterproofing. PVC does not require PFAS-based water repellent coatings to achieve water resistance; the plastic material itself is inherently hydrophobic. No coating or surface treatment is described by the brand, meaning the waterproof property comes from the material's chemical structure and sealed seams, not an applied finish.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧴

PVC off-gassing and phthalate plasticizers

PVC formulations sometimes contain phthalate plasticizers to increase flexibility. This product's exact formulation is not disclosed; if phthalates are present, minimal off-gassing occurs at room temperature, but odor on opening is common and harmless. Phthalate migration to food or skin is negligible in this use case (external phone protection).

70/ 100
⏳

Seal degradation over time

User reviews on retail sites document that PVC seams and magnetic closures can loosen after 1-3 years of regular use, compromising waterproof integrity. This is material aging, not a chemical hazard, but it affects protective function. Replacement frequency is typical for mid-range pouches in this category.

45/ 100
⚠️

Vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) residual

PVC manufacturing can leave trace VCM (a carcinogen at high exposure) in finished products. Modern manufacturing controls are strict, and residual VCM in a sealed pouch poses no exposure risk. Open-air sniffing or prolonged inhalation of new-product smell is not a health concern at consumer-use levels.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No information available on zipper material or magnet composition. Standard practice in consumer pouches uses nickel-plated brass zippers and neodymium magnets; nickel sensitivity is rare but possible in prolonged direct contact. This pouch is not in direct contact with skin or food.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
🧠

Lead

No test results or recalls document heavy metals in the zipper, magnet, or frame hardware. Industry standards for consumer pouches have shifted toward lead-free and cadmium-free metals, but no certification is stated by the brand.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Lewis N Clark (the actual manufacturer; 'Waterproof Pouch' is the product line) is a travel accessories brand with a long retail history but limited public toxicology disclosures. No PFAS statement or third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, FDA compliance) are publicly documented for this product. The brand has not published recalls or safety controversies specific to this pouch model on record.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof pouches typically use one of three approaches, sealed fabric with PFAS-based water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating), silicone-coated materials, or PVC/vinyl. This PVC design avoids the most common concern in the category (PFAS in coatings). It is more durable than fabric alternatives but less eco-friendly; silicone-coated options offer a middle ground but are less common at this price point.

If you buy it

Store the pouch in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent material embrittlement; PVC can become brittle over years of UV exposure. Do not expose to temperatures above 50 degrees Celsius (122 Fahrenheit) or prolonged contact with solvents (acetone, gasoline). Inspect seams and zippers annually for wear; replacement is recommended if seals visibly degrade. Keep away from mouths of infants and small children during storage.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Waterproof Pouch has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Lewis N Clark WaterSeals Magnetic Waterproof Phone Pouch?

Pela

Flaxstic Compostable Phone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE✓ EWG Verified
  • Flax fiber and plant-based resin blend, compostable
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Coating degradation and durability over time

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Pela

Amazon.com: Pela Phone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE✓ Cradle to Cradle Certified
  • plant-based bioplastic (flax and other plant fibers)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Thermal degradation and warping

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Pela

Amazon.com: Pela: IPhone Case

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ Made SAFE Certified
  • Plant-based bioplastic (compostable blend)
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Bioplastic degradation and microparticle shedding

More waterproof phone cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.