Crossover High Waisted Bikini Bottom vs Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top is the clear pick. Aerie Crossover High Waisted Bikini Bottom carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Aerie Crossover High Waisted Bikini Bottom

Aerie

Crossover High Waisted Bikini Bottom

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 49/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Nylon/spandex blend (standard swimwear fabric)

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes in synthetic textiles

PossibleSpandex elastomer degradation and microfiber shedding

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

Patagonia

Women's Bottom Turn Racerback Bikini Top

PFAS grade

Excellent 90/100

Overall grade

Excellent 86/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear)

Confidence

72%

PossibleElastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes in synthetic textiles, Spandex elastomer degradation and microfiber shedding, Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing and Allergens in synthetic textiles (contact irritation) on the Aerie and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Elastane (spandex) degradation under heat or chlorine on the Patagonia and not on the Aerie.
  • The Aerie is Nylon/spandex blend (standard swimwear fabric) where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with elastane (standard swimwear), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More swimwear, see the full ranking