Driclor roll-on for excessive sweating 20ml vs Baking Soda Free Deodorant: which is safer?
Primally Pure Baking Soda Free Deodorant is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Antiperspirant Driclor
Driclor roll-on for excessive sweating 20ml
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Aluminium chlorohydrate active; roll-on container with standard plastic dispenser
Confidence
72%
PossibleAluminum systemic absorption and accumulation
ReportedSkin irritation and contact dermatitis
PossibleMicrobial contamination of applicator
Our pick
Primally Pure
Baking Soda Free Deodorant
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica)
Confidence
82%
PossibleSkin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Aluminum systemic absorption and accumulation, Skin irritation and contact dermatitis and Microbial contamination of applicator on the Antiperspirant Driclor and not on the Primally Pure.
- We flag Skin irritation from magnesium hydroxide alkalinity on the Primally Pure and not on the Antiperspirant Driclor.
- The Antiperspirant Driclor is Aluminium chlorohydrate active; roll-on container with standard plastic dispenser where the Primally Pure is mineral-based powder blend (arrowroot, magnesium hydroxide, mica), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Primally Pure is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More deodorant, see the full ranking