PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall57/ 100Good
Driclor roll-on for excessive sweating 20ml

Antiperspirant Driclor · Deodorant

Driclor roll-on for excessive sweating 20ml

Excellent

Lower concern, typical antiperspirant without known PFAS risks.

Verdict: BuyDriclor is a well-established antiperspirant with typical aluminum chlorohydrate formulation, no documented hazards beyond standard category risks, and lower PFAS concern.

This standard aluminium chlorohydrate roll-on lacks public evidence of PFAS ingredients or water-repellent coating treatments. No PFAS disclosures found.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Aluminium chlorohydrate active; roll-on container with standard plastic dispenser

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🔩

Aluminum systemic absorption and accumulation

Topical aluminum chlorohydrate does not penetrate intact skin significantly, but repeated daily application over years raises theoretical questions about cumulative aluminum exposure. Long-term epidemiological data do not show a causal link between antiperspirant use and Alzheimer's or bone disease, but this remains a topic of ongoing research and cannot be ruled out with absolute certainty.

70/ 100
⚠️

Skin irritation and contact dermatitis

Aluminum chlorohydrate at clinical strengths (20%) is known to cause erythema, itching, and burning in sensitive individuals, particularly if applied to freshly shaved or broken skin. Driclor labeling includes warnings for this; incidence is generally low but more common than in consumer-grade products due to higher salt concentration.

45/ 100
⚠️

Microbial contamination of applicator

Roll-on applicators that contact skin directly can become reservoirs for bacteria if the product is not sealed properly or if the ball mechanism is damaged. This is a general hygiene concern for all roll-on deodorants and antiperspirants, not specific to Driclor, but users should inspect the applicator for visible debris or mold.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Plastic leaching from roll-on dispenser

The plastic housing and ball applicator in Driclor roll-on containers are standard polypropylene or similar food-contact grade materials. No documented cases of BPA, phthalates, or other plasticizers leaching into the formulation have been reported for this product, and the aqueous/alcoholic base is not a strong solvent for polymer additives.

95/ 100

Fragrance allergens or irritants

Driclor is unscented or minimally fragranced compared to cosmetic deodorants, reducing the risk of fragrance-related contact sensitization or respiratory irritation. No fragrance allergens are listed as active ingredients in standard formulations.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Driclor's active ingredient is aluminum chlorohydrate, a salt compound that works by forming a plug in sweat ducts to reduce perspiration. This is the same active used in most clinical-strength antiperspirants globally and has decades of safety monitoring. The roll-on dispenser uses a standard plastic ball applicator and housing; the formulation itself contains no known problematic dyes, heavy metals, or volatile organic compounds at levels of concern for topical use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Driclor is owned by Stiefel Laboratories (acquired by GSK) and has been marketed for hyperhidrosis since the 1970s. The brand provides ingredient labeling but does not publish detailed safety reports or third-party certifications. No significant recalls or safety controversies have been documented in public health databases for this product. The manufacturer does not publicly address PFAS, which is typical for this category but reflects a general industry silence rather than a red flag.

How it compares in its category

Driclor is a higher-strength antiperspirant (typically 20% aluminum chlorohydrate) positioned against consumer-grade roll-ons and closer to prescription alternatives like Drysol. It avoids fragrance additives and artificial colorants, making it simpler in formulation than many cosmetic deodorants. Clinical-strength antiperspirants carry the same aluminum exposure profile; Driclor does not stand out as higher or lower risk in this respect.

If you buy it

Apply to clean, dry skin once daily in the evening and wash off in the morning to minimize skin irritation and allow skin recovery time. Do not use on broken or irritated skin, and perform a patch test on inner arm if you have sensitive skin. Replace the product if the roll-on ball becomes clogged or the plastic housing shows cracks; a compromised applicator can harbor bacteria. Store in a cool, dry place; heat does not degrade aluminum chlorohydrate, but extreme temperatures may affect the plastic dispenser seal.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Antiperspirant Driclor has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Deodorant

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Puracy

Deodorant Cream 2oz Glass

Glass jar; water-based cream formula

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Glass container breakage

Moderate concern

45

Low concern, glass container and water-based cream with PFAS-free commitment.

Bare metal or glass, no coating at all

Tom's of Maine Deodorant

Tom's of Maine

Deodorant

mineral-based, baking soda formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergen content

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Baking soda skin irritation

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern from mineral-based formula with public PFAS-free positioning, though no independent third-party verification.

Risky category by default

Tom's of Maine Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

Tom's of Maine

Most-Loved Deodorant Bundle

mineral-based and plant-derived actives; stick formulation

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
⚠️

Fragrance allergens

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Skin irritation from mineral salts

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern deodorant with mineral-based formula and PFAS-free claim aligned to brand ethos, but no third-party verification found.

Risky category by default

More deodorant grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.