Aerio 35 Backpack vs Refugio Day Pack 30L: which is safer?

Patagonia Refugio Day Pack 30L is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Arc'teryx Aerio 35 Backpack

Arc'teryx

Aerio 35 Backpack

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon/polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating (unspecified)

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and chemical release

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from ripstop fabric

Our pick

Patagonia Refugio Day Pack 30L

Patagonia

Refugio Day Pack 30L

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Bad 13/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Confidence

62%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (unspecified replacement for PFAS)

ReportedNylon and polyester fiber shedding / microfiber release

LikelyCoating degradation over time

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating degradation and chemical release and Microplastic shedding from ripstop fabric on the Arc'teryx and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (unspecified replacement for PFAS), Nylon and polyester fiber shedding / microfiber release and Coating degradation over time on the Patagonia and not on the Arc'teryx.
  • The Arc'teryx is Nylon/polyester ripstop with DWR coating (unspecified) where the Patagonia is Nylon/polyester blend with DWR (durable water repellent) treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 25 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Patagonia is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More backpacks, see the full ranking